Thursday, November 25, 2021

Politics of Anti-Semitic: Do Not Inject in Palestinian Issue, Blame Israel's war minded Leaders, they are playing with Jewish Peoples' Lives everywhere in the World

Politics of Anti-Semitic: Do Not Inject in Palestinian Issue, Blame Israel's war minded Leaders, they are playing with Jewish Peoples' Lives everywhere in the World 

Only two leaders  can solve the Israel-Palestinian conflict if Senator Bernie Sanders becomes Prime Minister of Great Britain and Jeremy Corbyn becomes United States President

Mujeeb Khan 

"Our solidarity here in Landon is to bring about the permanent peace in which the Palestinian people 
will no longer even be under occupation again"
"Israel could halt the blood shade by ending the siege of  Gaza and the occupation of  Palestine"
Jeremy Corbyn, former Labour Party Leader

"I think our goal is very simple. It is to understand that what's going on in Gaza today is unsustainable
when you have 70% of the young people unemployed when people cannot leave the community when
hospitals and wastewater plants have been destroyed, which is unsustainable. And the job of the United 
States are to bring people together. And that is what we have got to try to do"
Senator Bernie Sanders


Ghettos in Palestine 

Prosperity in Israel's Settlements

  Israel-Palestine is a chronic conflict, and after World War II, this conflict was given to the world by the world powers. Seventy years later, when they have no solution to this chronic conflict, they declare the party in the conflict a terrorist in support of the party that dominates the conflict. And they see it as an easy solution to the conflict. However, in this conflict, the military extremists of one party are the counter-extremism of the other party, and it's’ called terrorism. But on the other hand, on Israel’s border, these world powers were backing terrorists against the Syrian government. They have given weapons and training, they destroyed a country, millions of families shattered. But Israeli leaders have said nothing against terrorism in their neighbor. British Home Secretary Priti Patel has called the Palestinian militant group Hamas a terrorist organization and called for its banning. The Home Secretary described “Hamas as fundamentally and rabidly anti-Semitic.”

  Military extremism of one party in this conflict is counter-extremism of the other party and called it terrorism. The Zionist Party’s campaign was not peaceful when it was demanding from Britain a Jewish state in Palestine, and they also took the path of terrorism. The British Home Secretary, unaware of the history of the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel, which housed British troops. The British Home Secretary does not even know who the oppressor is and the oppressed in this conflict, who has the power, and who is powerless. In the war with the Palestinians, the Israeli kill two hundred Palestinians, and only ten Israelis die. Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was not assassinated by Hamas, Hezbollah, or Iran; Yitzhak Rabin was the first Israeli Prime Minister who has signed a peace treaty with the Palestinians. The persecution that the Palestinians were facing, Prime Minister Rabin’s conscience felt it and he acknowledged the importance of an independent Palestinian state, but Israel’s extremists, enemies of peace, assassinated Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, it was an assassination of peace. This Israeli policy has made the Palestinian a permanent enemy to gain international sympathy. President Bill Clinton worked hard to resolve the Israel-Palestine conflict; no other US president has done so. President Clinton had come close to resolving the Israel-Palestinian conflict. The administration that came after President Bill Clinton, it had a close alliance with the extremists in Israel who had killed Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and killed the peace. The Bush administration has vindicated all Palestinian agreements with Israel.

  The rise of Hamas was Israel’s policy of dividing and occupying the Palestinians. Israel occupied the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Six-Day War. In 1993, Israel handed over Gaza to the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords, and in 1995, Israel withdrew its troops from Gaza. That same year, the Palestinian Authority held elections. Hamas won most seats. Hamas had become a big party; Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has refused to hand over the administration of Palestine to Hamas. A fierce battle broke out between the Palestinian two factions, in which more than a hundred Palestinians were killed. Israel exploited this situation. The United States, Britain, and France also gave Israel a chance to take advantage of the situation. They called the Palestinian leadership in the West Bank corrupt and Hamas in Gaza a Terrorist. The West Bank and Gaza were under Israel’s military occupation, the legally occupying country has a responsibility to provide all the basic needs of the people under its occupation, Israelis were very clever they have handed over this responsibility to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza, and Israel had tanks, military armored vehicles, and soldiers on Palestinian land. In Gaza, Hamas is funded by Gulf countries, and in the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority is funded by the European Union and the United States. The United States provides $10 billion a year defense and security aid to Israel. This setup was good to keep the Arabs upright. If the international community understands this setup of Israel’s military occupation of the Palestinians, it will understand why the United States and its European allies have not been able to resolve this humanitarian conflict in 60 years. Instead of facing a global backlash against Israel’s violent and outlawed aggression, Israel’s leaders are using the anti-Semitic shield. How have Jews in the United States been charged by prosecutors with money laundering, tax fraud, and economic corruption in the last 20 years? The courts had sentenced them, were prosecutors and judges anti-Semitic? Israeli leaders and officials participate in political corruption, illegal activities, and extra-judicial killings. Mossad agents killed a Palestinian in a Dubai hotel and clandestinely left the country. After the fall of Saddam Hussein, Mossad also killed Palestinians in Iraq who had taken refuge in Iraq under Saddam Hussein's government. Israel has killed Iranian nuclear scientists in Tehran. Israel has a lengthy list of political corruptions. It is a mistake that Israel’s behavior was ignored because of its anti-Semitic nature. We are not against Judaism. This is an ancient religion, and we respect it. We do not agree with the intentions of those who want to destroy the Jewish state. If the Palestinians had a military occupation of the Jewish lands, and the treatment of the Palestinians in the Israeli military occupation was the treatment of the Jews, we would be supporting them.

 

 

      

  











Thursday, November 18, 2021

Victims of Regime Change Wars; Now They Have Nothing, No Country, No Home, No Life, No Peace, Children Have No Future, Now They are Going through Torture, Cruelty, Misery, Worst Human Rights, The Tragedy of the Century

  

Victims of Regime Change Wars; Now They Have Nothing, No Country, No Home, No Life, No Peace, Children Have No Future, Now They are Going through Torture, Cruelty, Misery, Worst Human Rights, The Tragedy of the Century

Mujeeb Khan

 

I have a pen in my hand, light in my mind

What can oppress me, a frost of darkness

I am worried about the peace of the world, you are

The sorrow of your own self

I am rising, you are about to set

Habib Jalib

[ Habib Jalib was a renowned progressive poet of Pakistan. Every military government has imprisoned 

him, he wrote this poem in the 1980s]   


 


 


 

Refugees from Regime Change Countries


   If the Arab capitals are asking why they took part in the destruction of the state of Syria? What was their interest in this? While they themself were a dictator. And dictators never fight against a dictator by joining forces with external forces to remove him from power, because it strengthens the opposing forces of the dictators and weakens the dictators. If Saddam Hussein were in Iraq, no American president has said that the Saudi government could not survive more than seven days without the United States. The Arab rulers have realized their mistake, they will be ashamed to see the Syrian cities in ruins, innocents Syrians, and when they see homeless women, children, men thousands of miles away behind a barbed-wire fence on the borders of other countries, their conscience must have puzzled them with hundreds of questions. Let the judges of the courts of the United States and Europe tell the world what their crime was that they punished by their governments. However, now that Arab governments are building ties with Syria, why are they prevented from doing so. These are free and sovereign countries; they have the right to make their own decisions. They came to their senses and now they are looking for the right path in which there will be peace, stability, and a prosperous future. Twenty precious years have been lost in the war on terror with the United States has neither eliminated terrorism nor resolved the Middle East’s chronic conflict. On the contrary, fifty new terrorist groups have been given to the world, from A to j, ISIS groups have left in the Middle East. And from K to Z, ISIS factions have left in Afghanistan. The United States has been in Afghanistan for twenty years, the Taliban controlled 60 percent of Afghanistan, but ISIS did not detonate bombs there. But soon after the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, ISIS became active in Afghanistan. While the Taliban announced the creation of an Islamic state in Afghanistan, and on hearing this, ISIS starts terrorism. Who is patronizing ISIS in Afghanistan? Terrorist groups cannot conduct terrorism without funds.

  It is easiest for the US and NATO to start wars, but the most demanding thing to do is to deal with the consequences of wars. In twenty years, the United States has not won the Afghan war, and in fifteen years, the United States has not been able to stabilize the Middle East so that the refugees who have gathered on the borders of Europe can return to their home countries. The Belarus government opened its border with Poland to refugees from Iraq, Syria, Libya, and North Africa and pushed them into Poland. It was a tsunami for Poland, and it was also a tsunami for Belarus. The Polish government is not ready to accept these refugees. The people in Europe are angry with the United States for generating refugees. And those who are refugees are also angry with the United States that the US policy against their country is giving them this torture and misery. However, Poland joined the United States in the war to destabilize Iraq.

  The US regime change policy was to destabilize and disintegrate the Middle East countries. The US had intervened militarily against the will of a large majority of people in Syria, Libya, and Iraq. Imposing military intervention on other countries is a serious violation of human rights. The world has seen how the United States meddled in Lebanon during President Trump’s impeachment proceeding in the Senate over Russia’s meddling in the United States. The Trump administration has announced $150 million in weapons to the Lebanese government. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has opposed it. National Security Adviser John Bolton was also part-time in charge of Israel’s security. While Mike Pompeo was the de jure Secretary of State of the United States, but he was the de facto Secretary of State of Israel. At the request of Prime Minister Netanyahu, President Trump terminated the Iran nuclear deal, tarnished the image of the United States, strained US relations with Europe, and all US allies in Europe urged President Trump to join the Iran deal. But the United States valued Benjamin Netanyahu over American interests, with President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner asking gulf rulers to recognize Israel. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was tasked with destabilizing Lebanon, and Pompeo sent to Beirut with a message to expel Hezbollah from the government. The United States has declared Hezbollah a terrorist organization. The US statement further complicated Lebanon’s internal political crisis. The Lebanese President Michel Aoun was telling Pompeo that 60 percent of the people had voted for Hezbollah, and Hezbollah is in the government. In a democratic setup Christians, Sunnis, and Shiites are united. Israeli pressure and US intervention Lebanon also destabilized. Now Lebanon is economically bankrupt and politically disarray. The Lebanese are fleeing from Lebanon, fed up with the economic and political situation. And seeking refuge in Europe.

  The United States and Europe have valued hundred Israeli political leaders over the 350 million people in the Middle East. President Bush has said that Saddam Hussein was a major threat to the region and the world, and with the departure of Saddam Hussein, the world will save from great danger and the region’s conflicts will be resolved. But the fact is that the conflicts in the region have increased by a thousand percent. The Holocaust is what refugees are going through. And this Holocaust is happening in the watch of the United States and Europe. The US meddling further complicated Lebanon’s internal political crisis.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                           

 

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

War and Lethal Weapons are as Dangerous to The Planet as Climate Change, and Lethal Weapons Must Link to Climate Change, Greenhouse Gases, and Depleted Uranium Missiles are Equally or More Harmful to the Environment, in Climate Change the Whole Family Does Not Die in a Missile Strike in a Second I

War and Lethal Weapons are as Dangerous to The Planet as Climate Change, and Lethal Weapons Must Link to Climate Change, Greenhouse Gases, and Depleted Uranium Missiles are Equally or More Harmful to the Environment, in Climate Change the Whole Family Does Not Die in a Missile Strike in a Second

In twenty years, in war, close to a million people died, that many people during this period did not die in climate change, two million people were displaced, and are migrants

Mujeeb Khan

 

This is global warming


This is Syria, a Victim of global war


The giant garbage dump left by the US military near Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul, environment hazardous
 

Iraqi volunteers salvaging and cleaning up the debris and destruction in the Bab al-Saray in the old city of northern Iraq, city of Mosul

Iraq war destruction of the environment, Iraqi children pay a high health cost of war air pollution 

US military left behind in Iraq a Toxic dump of oil drums and acid cans southern outskirts of the city of Karbala

  For over 30 years, on climate has been talking about keeping the environment clean from greenhouse gas, fossil fuel, emissions, and carbon dioxide. But things are not moving ahead. One of the reasons is that the world has been in a state of war for thirty years. And the global conference on climate in Glasgow, Scotland, no one has said how much, pollution has been caused by weapons, bombs, and missiles which are full of toxic, chemicals and gases, cause climate change? One of the reasons China and Russia did not attend the Glasgow summit was probably because of the accumulation of toxic weapons around them, and they are in the climate of war. It is not in the interest of the world to clean the half glass climate and pollute the half glass climate. There is talk of clean energy by 2050, but by 2050, there is no talk of eliminating deadly weapons that pollute the air. How much did the US pollute the environment by dropping 15,000-pound bombs on Afghanistan’s highest mountains? What kind of chemicals and gas were in it? The world knows nothing about it.

  The war climate in the Middle East is so deep that it has become a climate change exception. People have become accustomed to living in the polluted environment of wars here. Iraq has had a war climate for 18 years. Syria and Libya have been at war for 10 years. Bombs, missiles, rockets, guns used to the fullest. diesel smoke from armored trucks and tanks are making the environment clean or polluting the climate? What kind of chemicals and explosives are in bombs, missiles, and rockets and how do they spoil the air, water, and soil? How many people died in the war in the last twenty years? And how people have died because of climate change? Speeches were made at a climate summit in Glasgow, during which Washington announced the sale of $650 million worth of missiles to Saudi Arabia. In seven years, the United States has sold billions of dollars worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia has used these weapons to harm Yemen’s climate and the region’s environment. Had this war not been in the interests of the United States, Saudi Arabia would have been charged with crimes against humanity and damaging the environment. But the reason is that the United States itself has fought a similar war in Iraq and has damaged the environment and destroyed humanity in Iraq. The United States has used depleted uranium missiles in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. The use of depleted uranium missiles had affected the environment of these countries, water and soil contamination went to these countries. There were defective births reported in Iraq. When human lives are affected by wars and weapons used in wars, it falls into climate change.

  President Gaddafi handed over his nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons to the Bush administration. The Bush administration had withdrawn its nuclear weapons from Libya but had not been able to bring chemical and biological weapons to the United States. President Gaddafi had placed barrels of chemical and biological in the desert and informed the Bush administration, where these barrels had gone, had no idea. Libya, Syria, Yemen, Chad, Mali, Niger is all at war. The climate is contaminated with the use of weapons. Climate change is not immune to the effects of war.

 











Wednesday, November 3, 2021

The Difference Between the Moral Values of Poor and Small Nations and Rich and Powerful Nations



The Difference Between the Moral Values of Poor and Small Nations and Rich and Powerful Nations

Mujeeb Khan

Mission accomplished, Afghanistan liberated for the second time, war is over, we want good relations with the United States

 

 

Mission accomplished, Saddam Hussein removed, no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but the war will continue


  When the Taliban announced the end of the war after entering Kabul, no one could believe it. Then the Taliban talked of good relations with every country and expressed good relations with the United States. The world was shocked to hear this from the Taliban. The Taliban’s mission was to drive US and NATO troops out of Afghanistan, and their mission could have been completed in twenty days or twenty months. But the United States gave them twenty years to fulfill their mission. And when their mission was completed, the Taliban’s war ended. The Taliban began work on a mission for peace and reconstruction in Afghanistan the next day. The Taliban’s agreement with the United States on the withdrawal of American citizens from Afghanistan cooperated with the United States in implementing the agreement. This is the difference between the moral values of poor and small countries and rich and powerful countries. However, the US campaign for the liberation of Afghanistan from foreign forces began in the 1980s to liberate Afghanistan from Soviet forces. At that time, no one would have thought that the Afghans would have to fight a bloody war with the US and NATO forces to liberate Afghanistan. The United States has spent millions of dollars on Afghan Mujahideen just to get Soviet troops out of Afghanistan. But the United States has spent billions of dollars on Afghan resistance to the presence of US and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

  President George W. Bush ignored the Reagan-Bush administration’s stance on foreign troops in Afghanistan. The Taliban were Mujahideen at that time, and they had the support of the United States. The Mujahideen were from rural areas. But, like the Soviet Union, the United States had its Afghan government in Kabul. Which was the government of the urban Afghans and the United States supported them. and the war against the Taliban began indefinitely. The Bush administration did not unite the different nationalities after removing the Taliban from power. Rather, it deepened the division on nationalities in Afghan society. Now twenty years later, the Taliban have begun to unite Afghan society.

 Saddam Hussein’s ouster in Iraq was an illegal act. However, the issue of deadly weapons in Iraq was in the Security Council, and the case was overseen in accordance with Security Council resolutions. There were no deadly weapons found in Iraq. This means that the Iraqi government did not lie to the world. The Bush administration should not have used excessive military force against the Bagdad government. But when the weapons were not found, Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush dismantled the entire Iraqi government’s administrative structure in Baghdad and imposed a government exported from the United States to Baghdad. What a tragedy in history that the world did not accept the occupation of Kuwait by the Iraqi army. President George H. Bush liberated Kuwait from the Iraqi army. But at the behest of his son, George W. Bush occupied Iraq by US forces, and this is the joint legacy of father and son. The Taliban ended the war against the United States after the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan and spoke of good relations with the United States. This is the difference between the moral values of rich and poor nations. If deadly weapons had not been found in Iraq, the United States would have withdrawn its troop immediately, even after Saddam Hussein was ousted, the government should have been handed over to Baghdad. How did the United States achieve a peaceful solution to a problem with a military strike? It only harmed humanity.

  The United States is a complex superpower, and it is difficult for small and weak countries to deal with it. The Senate has one hundred members, and each senator has its foreign policy. Congress has 435 members, and each member of Congress has an idea about world affairs. The 535 members of Congress and Senators have their own staff. This staff has its own foreign policy. Who coaches congressmen and senators about world affairs? Then there are the appointments in the State Department, they have their own philosophy about global affairs, mostly coming from different think tanks. Then those who are nominated in national security affairs give top priority to national security in foreign policy. And downplay the importance of diplomacy in foreign affairs. Then there are about 5,000 or more lobbies in Washington, DC. Which work in the interests of the foreign governments. Then there is the powerful Israeli lobby, which serves to make the interests of the Israeli government the interests of the United States national security. The instability that the United States has brought to the Middle East has strengthened Israel’s interests. Without taking from Israel, Arab governments are falling in Israel’s footsteps. The Middle East is divided between Shia-Sunny, Arab-non-Arab in Israel’s interest. President Trump terminated the nuclear deal with Iran only at the demand of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, signed by the Obama-Biden administration. Fifteen members of the Security Council backed the Iran deal. But the United States has broken a global agreement just to pacify Israel. If the United States was a party to the Iran deal, Iran did not violate it. The United States violated the Iran agreement, and now the United States must move to end this violation and join the agreement. Iran does not trust the United States, after two years of negotiations with an administration, Iran reached an agreement on its nuclear program. The next administration disapproved of the agreement. What is the guarantee of a compromise with the third administration now that the fourth administration will continue to implement it? And what happened to Muammar Gaddafi in Libya will not happen to Iran.