Ukraine-Russia Conflict: Europe on the Brink of Nuclear War, Europe Did Not See Such a Dangerous Situation in the Cold War, NATO and US Intervention are Responsible for Bringing the Conflict Closer to war

Ukraine-Russia Conflict: Europe on the Brink of Nuclear War, Europe Did Not See Such a Dangerous Situation in the Cold War, NATO and US Intervention are Responsible for Bringing the Conflict Closer to war

Mujeeb Khan

Why is Ukraine's sovereignty so dear to NATO and US in Europe? 

 

Ukraine shows off  US military hardware 

 

The US sends Ukraine 80 tones of  ammunition 

 

The second batch of  American weapons delivered to Ukraine 

  When the circus is over, elephants, horses, donkeys, monkeys, lions, bears, clowns move to another city, and the circus begins there. The US and NATO wars are like a circus. The Afghan war ended five months ago, after that, the US war in Iraq also ended. Weapons from these two countries were loaded into trucks and began searching for a place to dump them. The war in Ukraine was a circus-like scene. The weapons were dumped in Ukraine for use in the war with Russia. Baltic countries have also given Made in America weapons. After the Middle East, this region has filled with weapons and ammunition. The disinformation against Russia in the United States and in Europe in 2022 is the same as the misinformation campaign against Saddam Hussein in Iraq in 2002. At the time, the Saudis and the Gulf rulers were intimidated into believing that Saddam Hussein had deployed 100,000 troops on the Saudi border and would attack Saudi Arabia at any time. This is credible intelligence. However, President Putin, his foreign minister, and other Russian officials have made it clear repeatedly that Russia will not invade Ukraine. But daily, top US and NATO officials tell the world that Russia will invade Ukraine. UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres said in a statement that Russia will not invade Ukraine and has ended the debate.

 The core issue was Russia’s security concerns, which should address, the issue not so complicated. This would resolve in a very pleasant environment. The world is not hung in it. just five months ago, the United States fought its security war in Afghanistan from thousands of miles away for twenty years. But in the end, talks with the Taliban have given security to the United States. Eastern and Baltic countries should keep Afghanistan in mind. Ever since these countries joined NATO, they have been dragged into unending wars. When these countries were in the Warsaw Pact, they did not have a security problem. But since the end of the Cold War, NATO has become a dominant military entity in European politics. New conflicts are emerging in Europe. If countries in NATO have an insurance policy for security, but for other countries, NATO is a threat to peace, stability, and security. In the presence of NATO, the new US-Europe Cold War is a major threat to world peace. The only way to counter this situation is for Russia to link armed control to NATO activities, add Ukraine to it. Russia is not Afghanistan or Iraq; it is a major nuclear power in Europe. Economic sanctions on Russia would be a serious setback for Europe. If Russia removes from the global financial system, it will be the beginning of a new global financial system. Ukraine's saga will have far-reaching consequences. The United States is moving from one war to another.

  “We are not the policeman of the world,” said President Barack Obama, President Donald Trump, and President Joe Biden, but when they sit in the White House, they are somehow the world’s policemen. President Obama has had the role of the policeman in the world for eight years. President Putin is still a victim of President Obama’s role as a world policeman. Ukraine is the invention of President Obama’s world policeman role. Russia’s troops in Syria have come only because of President Obama's policeman Syrian policy. President Trump was from the corporate world, so it was not in his nature to be a policeman. If Donald Trump were president, he would never go to Europe with police to settle the Russia-Ukraine dispute. President Biden may also want to keep the United States out of the Ukraine conflict, but he has to bow to the war machine. President Biden refused to hand over $500 million worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia but then handed them over to the Saudi government under pressure from the war machine. The Saudi government killed hundreds of innocent Yemenis with these weapons. War Machine’s propaganda machine blames Iran. The war machine is more powerful in the world today than the President of the United States.

 Today, Europe is on the brink of a dangerous nuclear war. NATO’s three major nuclear powers are ready for war against Russia, a nuclear power. But the United States and European media are not telling the public about this dangerous situation. If the public is told that Europe is on the brink of nuclear war, people will take the streets like a tsunami against NATO and the United States. And they will solve the problem of Ukraine.

      

The United States, In Cold War, President Reagan said, “government is the problem, not the solution,” In the Post-Cold War World, America’s Global Government is the Problem, Not the Solution

The United States, In Cold War, President Reagan said, “government is the problem, not the solution,” In the Post-Cold War World, America’s Global Government is the Problem, Not the Solution

Mujeeb Khan

 

 

 

Vladimir Putin, the most experience Russian President, dealing with the fifth United States President Joe Biden

 

  One wrong US policy creates ten unfamiliar problems for the world, and then out of ten issues twenty contemporary issues arise. This is not an exaggeration, this is true. The state of the world is in front. The world either faces natural disasters or is subject to US policies. In the history of the world, the policies of a powerful country have never had such a profound effect on the world. This is not in the positive sense but in the negative sense. There are wars everywhere, weapons supply is not a problem. There is chaos in every continent. The world is in total disarray. The world economy is stable because of China. The definition of “mission accomplished” is narrow in US policy, the regime change mission has been completed, and the world is responsible for the aftermath. The United States has not eliminated terrorism. Nor has Iraq become Germany or Japan. Nor has it given peace to the Middle East. Nor has the Palestinian-Israel conflict resolved. East Asia has been shaken by warmongering. Attempts were made to end the security situation in Europe by manufacturing a conflict in Ukraine. What has the United States, Europe, and NATO done to promote world peace since the end of the Cold War?

  The Cold War was over, but the US and NATO countries' arm storages were full of weapons. The question was, what to do about it? the answer was that there is no point in keeping it in the arm storage to use these weapons. The Iraq war has opened the door to new wars in the Middle East. Violating and destroying the territorial integrity of Syria and Libya has created waves of new terrorism and severe economic problems in North and West Africa. The tsunami of migration has arisen in Europe. Before the Iraq war, it would have been unthinkable where the Iraq war would take the United States and the world. “People in Iraq will greet our troops with flowers,” said Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush’s secretary of defense, “and we will have surgery in Iraq and come back.” American kids who play war video games would not think so.

  However, the United States has opened two fronts of the war, one against Russia in Europe and the other against China in East Asia, while leaving all fronts of war open in West Asia. Democracy will be subordinate to NATO by giving it the status of a global military body. NATO will extend to Asia, especially the Middle East, Africa. Old colonial system in the new bottle. The United States is not working as fast to spread democracy in the world as it is to militarize the world. The US congressional delegation was in Ukraine, but instead of sending a strong message of peace and peaceful resolution of the conflict to the Ukrainian government, the delegation assures the Ukrainian government of the supply of the most lethal weapons and military aid. The delegation did not teach the Ukrainian government a democratic way of resolving the conflict. Instead, the Ukrainian government has asked to provide lethal weapons to defend itself. This shows that the leaders in the United States do not have faith in resolving disputes in a peaceful and democratic way. For 25 years they have been teaching the solution of any political conflicts in the world by the full force of arms.

  More than 300 US companies do trillions of dollars business in China, but the United States has called China a strategic enemy because there is no place for US arms companies in China’s economic politics. This is the difference between the democratic politics of the United States and the economic politics of China in the human interest. Democracy has been damaged by the politics of arms supply.

  Today, sovereignty, territorial integrity is a major topic in the capitals of the United States, Europe, and the world. But for twenty years the United States and its European allies have committed serious violations of small and most vulnerable countries. And now they are lecturing Russia and the world on it, listening to their lectures on Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity is awkward. Russia is a neighbor of Ukraine. Russia has troops on its border. But the uproar in the United States and Europe is as if Russia’s troops have besieged Ukraine. But just as Iran has been besieged by US and European warships and threatened Iran’s territorial integrity. There are violations of Iran's sovereignty. This is a more dangerous situation than Ukraine. US and European troops have come from thousands of miles away and are stationed on the Iranian border, along with them, Israel has also attacked Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Syria and Iran are sovereign countries, if Iran is helping the Damascus government against the terrorists in Syria, what is the problem for Israel that killed Iranians by bombing Iranians in Syria. Iran and Syria are not attacking Israel. Those who talk about Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity should be ashamed of it.

  Interestingly, Secretary of State Tony Blinken stated during a visit to East Asia that “denuclearization the Korean Peninsula” the three Iranian governments have put on the table a proposal to ban nuclear and most lethal weapons in the Middle East, but the US response is, “all options are on the table.” In the Post Cold War world, the US is the problem, not the solution. In East Asia, the United States 24/7 sees China, very shortsighted thinking. The United States, Japan, and Australia have a defense pact against China. The response was that North Korea had conducted four missile tests and would have eight more. China is so big that the defense packets of the US, Japan, and Australia saw by the leaders of North Korea against them, not against China. Thirty thousand US troops were stationed near the North Korean border. North Korea is facing the same situation as the Ukrainian government. If Ukraine has the right to defend itself with lethal weapons, the people and government of North Korea have examples from Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan. These countries did not commit any aggression against the United States.

 

                                                                                                       

Russia-Ukraine Conflict: It Can Solve in One Hour Forty-five Minutes, Do Not Park NATO’s Tanks in Front of Russia’s Driveway, as is Do Not Park Your SUV in Front of the White House, is a Security Zone

Russia-Ukraine Conflict: It Can Solve in One Hour Forty-five Minutes, Do Not Park NATO’s Tanks in Front of Russia’s Driveway, as is Do Not Park Your SUV in Front of the White House, is a Security Zone

Mujeeb Khan

President Joe Biden and the NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg during the summit in Brussel

NATO secretary-general with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelennskyy at Nato Headquarter in Brussels, 'all-out war with Russia'

 

President Vladimir Putin

  Do not think that you are smarter than the one you are negotiating with but think that he is smarter than you. In the same way, do not think that what is in front of you is weak, but think that he is stronger than you. After 20 years of the Afghan war in which NATO has suffered a humiliating defeat. NATO has created a new dangerous war environment for the world. Can NATO win the war with Russia after losing the war to the Taliban? Now NATO is trying to prove its strength with Russia in the Ukraine conflict. In the twenty days since the war ended in Afghanistan, NATO has created a new war environment for the world. As the Third World War on Ukraine begins. Russia has a very reasonable demand that does not park NATO’s tanks in front of our driveway. The US and NATO’s secretary-general insist the tanks are on sovereign land. Russia should not be worried. While Russia says its troops are on our borders. But the US and NATO are not ready to back down for peace. If lasting peace is in the interest of humanity, then it must give importance by accepting certain conditions of Russia. Governments in Libya, Syria, and Iraq have warned of the dire consequences of US and NATO intervention against them. They were sovereign countries like Ukraine. The territorial integrity of these countries was as important as that of Ukraine. But NATO has launched aggression against Libya, Syria, Iraq but threatens to retaliate strongly against aggression against Ukraine. This is hypocrisy, this is NATO’s double face. NATO’s military action in Libya has devastated the lives of the Libyan people. Libya divided; Libya’s economy has collapsed. People in Libya’s neighboring countries depend on the Libyan oil industry for their livelihood. Their lives have also been ruined by NATO’s military action. The people of Libya and its neighbors should sue NATO in the International Court of Justice. And they should compensate for the damage caused by the NATO attack. Libya was not in NATO’s authority. NATO intervention in Libya was an illegal, gross violation of the law of sovereignty. NATO had violated Pakistan’s territorial integrity in the Afghan war and had conducted drone strikes inside Pakistan, in which innocent civilians were killed. While Pakistan was helping the US in the Afghan war.

  Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but NATO countries are behind it to protect Ukraine from Russia’s so-called aggression. Turkey is a member of NATO, but NATO countries were destabilizing Turkey. Turkish Kurds were trained in guerrilla warfare in Syria near the Turkish border. Turkey called these Kurds terrorists. The Turkish government had reacted strongly to the Obama administration, but the administration’s explanation was that the Kurds would eliminate ISIS from their areas. The Kurds conducted bombings in Turkey. More than two hundred Turkish citizens were killed in bomb blasts in Ankara and Istanbul. Turkey was an Islamic country, and NATO countries were watching on the sidelines. Surprisingly, the United States talks of promoting democracy in the world, but under the Obama administration, the Turkish military overthrew the Erdogan government. The plot was not hatched by President Putin against the NATO member state. In fact, the United States did. China has not yet overthrown the Taiwanese government. And Russia has not destabilized the Ukrainian government. China and Russia do not view the world with a Cold War mentality. Nor do they want to take the world into the Cold War.

  Ukraine was not a conflict before 2012-13. Who wrote the script to make Ukraine a dangerous conflict, she or he had a severe allergy to peace, suddenly Ukraine becomes a terrible conflict? Thousands were killed in the conflict. The United States and NATO have destroyed peace here. The supply of weapons to Ukraine has increased. Twenty years later, the United States gained independence from the Afghan war because of the efforts of Russia and China. NATO also has a role to play in making the Afghan war the longest war in US history. The United States was spending $1 billion per day on the Afghan war. Since the end of the Afghan war, the United States has saved $150 billion in about five months. Russia and China want the United States to spend those dollars to protect its people from viruses and give top priority to public health.

  Ukraine is a quite simple problem that can be solved in one hour and forty-five minutes. Russia and Ukraine were one country. The two understand each other well. In the Cold War, the Ukrainians were in government in the Kremlin. They were in the Communist Party’s Bosses. They had the same political ideology and the same political religion. But the problem is the politics of NATO and the weapons that stand in the way of resolving this conflict. NATO’s 30 countries are losers who have lost the war to the Taliban. NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg should have resigned after this defeat. Russia and China want neither cold nor hot war in the world. Their focus is on economic development. NATO and US policy are to keep Russia and China out of the economic development and engage in wars.

   

Tony Blair, when a Close Friend and Allies of Bill Clinton, Has Integrity, Dignity, Honor, Prestige, But, When He Joined the Bush-Cheney Cabal, Tony Blair Has Lost His Political Virginity

Tony Blair, when a Close Friend and Allies of Bill Clinton, Has Integrity, Dignity, Honor, Prestige, But, When He Joined the Bush-Cheney Cabal, Tony Blair Has Lost His Political Virginity

Mujeeb Khan

 

The future of American democracy looks bleak as the influence and meddling of the FBI Director, the Director of intelligence, and military generals have increased in the US democratic system in the name of homeland security. Who will be president and who will not be president, they will decide?

 

Tonys the kind of  guy who looks you straight in the eye and tells the truth, George Bush presents Tony Blair with a Presidential Medal of Freedom 

 The political awakening of the British people is highly encouraging as they have strongly opposed the knighthood award of the highest honor on former Prime Minister Tony Blair on New Year’s Day and have demanded to strip his knighthood. More than half a million have signed the petition online. The British people said that Tony Blair had lied about Iraq, falsely invaded Iraq. The blood of millions of innocent Iraqis is on the hands of Tony Blair. For almost 20 years, Iraqis have not been able to recover from this war. The young British soldiers were killed in Iraq, and the mothers of these soldiers were asking Prime Minister Tony Blair what Iraq did to us when we invaded Iraq. Prime Minister Blair has no answer for these British mothers.

 Tony Blair was an enlightened, progressive, and most popular leader in British politics in the 1990s. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair both had the same class background, and both came to the heights of politics through their struggle. There was not a significant difference in the political vision of the two. If Al Gore had been president, the political vision of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton would have continued. But Al Gore’s presidency was hit hard by the Supreme court ruling. The situation had changed for Prime Minister Blair. After 9/11, Prime Minister Blair came closer to the Bush administration. In the war against Iraq, Bush-Cheney wanted a leader like Tony Blair on their side. However, Bush-Cheney and Tony Blair had two different political views. But in Iraq, the financial benefits brought the two closers together. Bush-Cheney used a popular Prime Minister for their unpopular Iraq war. When Baghdad was captured by US forces, Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush established its American government in Iraq. Saddam Hussein’s ministries and security forces were suspended. British army evacuated Baghdad and sent them to Basra. Six hundred British Soldiers have died in the Bush-Cheney Iraq war. The Iraq war had nothing to do with Britain. Downing Street has ordered the Secretary of Defense to burn a secret memo stating that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was illegal. The memo written by Attorney General Lord Goldsmith said in the memo that “the conflict could be challenged under international law.” The illegality of the Iraq invasion must challenge under international law. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has declared the Iraq war illegal. Today, there are talks in Washington about harming democracy. Those who say that, are at the forefront of harming democracy.

  In the last twenty years, the administration has lied to the people. And their lies have done great damage to democracy. Earlier, they lied about deadly weapons in Iraq. When the deadly weapons were not found in Iraq, they again lied that intelligence had given us these reports. The director of this intelligence was George Tenet. He was awarded the Presidential Award for Outstanding National Service by President George W. Bush. No one said anything against it. Nobody talks about transparency in the systems. Seven thousand young Americans died in Iraq. Thirty thousand Americans are disabled. Every morning they wake up with these wounds and sleep with these wounds. March 3^rd is between January 6 and September 11, and the wounded soldiers of the Iraq war must gather before Capitol Building on March 3^rd and show their wounds to Congressmen and Senators.

  Democracy has been without accountability for twenty years. Democracy has gone into the pockets of millionaires and billionaires. Giving responsibility to the United States as the only superpower in the world has damaged the democratic system of the United States. The United States has failed to promote democracy in the world and now the United States is trying to save its democracy. Those in Congress for 30 or 40 years are responsible for that. The media hides or distorts facts. It would not be a misrepresentation if Senator Mitt Romney, Senator Mitch McConnel, and Speaker Paul Ryan were accused of derailing the US election process. They stated in the last days of the 2016 election campaign that “Hillary Clinton will not allow becoming president.” I am ashamed to write that today the United States is asking the Taliban to include women in the cabinet. FBI Director James Comey staged Hillary Clinton’s e-mail scandal drama after Speaker Paul Ryan, Senator Mitch McConnell, and Senator Mitt Romney made statements against Hillary Clinton. And FBI Director James Comey had stamped the FBI on the defeat of Hillary Clinton. It was a sad day in the history of American democracy. This was the new role of the FBI director in the US presidential election. These people have done great damage to democracy. In this gutter politics of Washington, when Donald Trump became president, from the next day onwards, everyone started pulling off President Trump’s paint. For four years, Russian meddling drama was on the stage of Congress. James Comey meddled in the election and Vladimir Putin accused.

  

   

     

Russia and China Have Taught the Taliban to Engage in Political Dialogue, Forty Years Later, The Taliban Have Laid Down Their Arms, The United States sees the Taliban Without Weapons as Weird

  

Russia and China Have Taught the Taliban to Engage in Political Dialogue, Forty Years Later, The Taliban Have Laid Down Their Arms, The United States sees the Taliban Without Weapons as Weird

Mujeeb Khan

 

 Representatives of Taliban led by Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar during an Afghan Conference marking a Century of  diplomatic relations between Afghanistan and Russia in Moscow

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi meets with Afghan Taliban in Tianjin

   Twenty years later, when the Afghan war has decided to end American troops have gone, so now it said that the decision to end the war and call forces done in haste. Due to chaos is seen in Kabul. This chaos was evidence of twenty years of failure of the United States in Afghanistan. It said that President Biden’s decision was wrong. However, it is too early to say whether the decision to end the war was wrong. Decisions are never wrong in the interest of peace and saving human lives. The primary signature on the Afghan war was that of President George W. Bush and the secondary signature was that of President Obama, which was to prolong the war. Fighting a pointless war for twenty years was just stupidity. When the Taliban weakened in eight years of President Bush, they could not defeat, but in the eight years of President Obama, the Taliban had become three times stronger, how was it possible to defeat them? Instead of wasting the American people’s time in Syria, President Obama should have worked 24/7 to free the United States from the war in Afghanistan. President Obama should have judged that the Afghan war could not be won, and the other way should have been able to save the face.

  However, the Taliban have emerged victorious on the battlefield and at the negotiating table. When the Taliban were mujahideen in the 1980s, the United States taught them to defeat Soviet forces with weapons, but seeing neither side succeed in the Afghan war, Russia and China taught the Taliban the ‘power of dialogue.’ And the Taliban will succeed at the negotiating table. The ceasefire agreement with the Taliban has signed by President Trump and President Biden has completed the agreement.

  To create the impression that the Kabul government fell due to the implementation of the agreement with the Taliban and with it all the state institutions also collapsed. In twenty years, the Afghan army and security agencies that had been created to protect the state had disappeared from the Taliban’s clutches. And how did it all happen? The US leadership and military commanders should talk about this, they must answer these questions. How the experiment of democratizing a tribal society and highly regressive religious customs has failed. President Bush and his advisers have made a fool of themselves by making the Afghan Warlords an ally of the United States against the Taliban. On the one hand, the US military was collaborating with Warlords to eliminate the Taliban and on the other hand, the Bush administration was making Warlords pillars of democracy and Afghanistan’s democratic institutions built on it. The Taliban were a large part of the Pashtun population, but they kept out of the political process to continue the war. Uzbeks and Tajiks were in key government institutions. There were also Uzbeks and Tajiks in the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Interior, the Intelligence, and the Army. When these institutions formed and the military and security training completed, it was a big mistake of the US military commanders to use these institutions against the Taliban. They should have thought that one day they would leave Afghanistan, but Uzbeks, Tajiks, Taliban must stay here with these institutions. The US commanders should have somehow made the Taliban part of these institutions. When the military strategy was not working then the political strategy should have come forward. Surprisingly, the only country in the world which was promoting democracy in Afghanistan for twenty years has had only a military strategy.

  In twenty years, the Taliban have learned politics. Politics has told them that politics is done by keeping arms, not by carrying arms. Politics must be compromised. Politics has taught the Taliban to make decisions with a cool head. In five months, they have managed the situation politically. Uzbeks and Tajiks have not joined the government. Twenty years of hatred have given some time to be reconciliation. They will then hold talks with them to make Afghanistan a united country. Corruption was rampant in Afghanistan in the presence of US and NATO forces and is now controlled by the Taliban. There is no doubt that Afghanistan is facing an extremely acute situation now. US economic sanctions have played a leading role in exacerbating the situation in Afghanistan. However, despite these conditions, Afghanistan is on the path of stability, it is unfortunate that NATO countries are not at the forefront of peace, but at the forefront of creating conditions for war.