Ukraine, Orthodox Christians Elect a Jew Volodymyr Zelensky with an Overwhelming Vote, No Israeli Leader Ever as Popular in European Countries as President Zelensky was, His Presidency is Now Tarnished by His Fellow Jews

Ukraine, Orthodox Christians Elect a Jew Volodymyr Zelensky with an Overwhelming Vote, No Israeli Leader Ever as Popular in European Countries as President Zelensky was, His Presidency is Now Tarnished by His Fellow Jews

Mujeeb Khan

 

 The withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan criticized Washington as a “fiasco” for the Biden administration. But the Biden administration’s Ukraine adventure has broken the Afghan fiasco record. Those who follow Ukraine's sequence will call it Russia’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine, as the American media and pundits are misrepresenting it. NATO and Europe have followed the same line. But the fact is that NATO, Europe, and the United States are responsible for the Holocaust in Ukraine. There was a quite simple solution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Russia did not have a lengthy list of demands. To this point, there were two demands that the NATO circus not be set up on Russia’s borders. Russia considers it a major threat to its security. Russia’s second demand was that the Ukrainian government suspend military operations against the Russian-speaking population in eastern Ukraine and negotiate with them. The Russians wanted an independent state of their own in eastern Ukraine. The settlement of the dispute was the Minsk Agreement, which was signed by the Government of Ukraine. And Russia has long urged the United States and Europe to work with the Ukrainian government to implement the agreement. French President Emmanuel Macron has sought a peaceful diplomatic solution to the conflict. President Macron held talks with President Putin in Moscow for hours. President Macron finally concluded that Russia’s security concern is genuine, and we must address that. But the problem was the Biden administration and NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, who wanted a proxy war against Russia. As is the custom in the United States, the delicacy of the conflict is understood later, but the movement of weapons begins first. President Biden calls France one of our oldest allies but did not heed President Macron’s advice. We do not understand the motives behind the catastrophic destruction of Ukraine.

  Religion is also a major factor in the Ukraine-Russian conflict. For centuries, churches in Ukraine and Russia were both under the Patriarch of Moscow. Moscow is its political center and Kyiv is its spiritual hub. Now long before the war church in Kyiv separated from the church in Moscow. But even now, one hundred million Orthodox Christians follow the Patriarch of Moscow. Around thirty percent of Christians in Israel are adherents of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Ukraine’s Orthodox Christians have for the first time elected a Jew Volodymyr Zelensky as president, with 65% of the vote. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said a Jew has been elected president of a European country. Zionist Jews in Israel were not happy with that? Ukraine was becoming an important base for Jews in the Baltic states. eventually, Israel’s importance would undermine the world. The Jews would be as divided in the world as the Orthodox Church was. Jews in America and Europe only want Israel to have Jewish power in the world. An immensely popular Jewish president in Ukraine, Zelensky, could counter Israel. No Israeli leader has ever been so popular in Europe. It would not be an exaggeration to say that the Jews have tarnished Zelensky’s presidency and that an Orthodox country has been destroyed. President Biden’s Secretary of State is Jewish, his national security adviser is Jewish, and his deputy national security adviser is Jewish. President Biden’s chief of staff is Jewish. NATO Secretary-General is Jewish. Then there were Jews in the governments and parliaments of Britain, France, Germany, and other European countries. But no one gave President Zelensky sincere advice on how to save Ukraine. The United States and Europe were fighting an economic war against Russia, and President Zelensky was arming to continue NATO’s proxy war with Russia.

  The Holocaust occurs when lethal weapons have given top priority. There is talk of sending weapons to Ukraine in every western capital. No one was talking about a diplomatic solution. The first popular Jewish president in an Orthodox Christian country was sabotaged by all western leaders. Crimes against humanity in war are not one-way traffic. Even those who provide lethal weapons are equally responsible.

   

The Third Time in a Muslim Country Pakistan America Overthrows a Popular Democratic Government and Imposed Autocracy, Why the West Does Not Want Democracy in the Islamic World? Is Autocracy in The Islamic World in the West’s Interest? Is this the Rule Base World Oder That China and Russia Want to Change?

  

The Third Time in a Muslim Country Pakistan America Overthrows a Popular Democratic Government and Imposed Autocracy, Why the West Does Not Want Democracy in the Islamic World? Is Autocracy in The Islamic World in the West’s Interest? Is this the Rule Base World Oder That China and Russia Want to Change?

Mujeeb Khan

 

 

  In the United States, the people elect the president, members of Congress, and senators. When the president is the presidential candidate, and he communicates to the people his policy views on world affairs, economic policy, promoting freedom and democracy in the world. But after the president is elected, his views change or he thinks the people forget, they do not remember what I said to them. And the policy made by those who were nominated to the State Department, the Pentagon. These peoples belong to different think tanks or lobbies. Their policy is the administration’s policy. The State Department and the Pentagon, under George W. Bush’s administration, were among the think tanks and lobbyists who spoke out and planned military strikes against Afghanistan and Iraq, and the occupation of Iraq was their policy. Barak Obama did not talk about starting new wars in the presidential election campaign, he called for an end to the war in Iraq. But Obama fought four new wars. Obama fought with NATO to end the Gaddafi regime in Libya, Obama fought in the civil war to oust Assad. Obama kept the Iraq and Afghan wars alive, but Obama had conquered Osama bin Laden, alive and dead. Obama has been at war for eight years. capturing, killing, or keeping Osama bin Laden alive made no difference to world peace. Saddam Hussein was described as a major threat to world peace, but then it became clear that the US war machine and its policy of spreading chaos was a real threat to world peace and stability. Donald Trump has shown no interest in the war in his election campaign. It was about America first. There was talk of liberating the United States from the lobbies. He told the American people that he was the protector of their interests. Donald Trump’s legacy was an agreement to end the Afghan war and keep the United States out of a new war.

 In his election campaign, Joe Biden spoke of democracy, human rights, and freedom. Joe Biden has united the world for World War III, not for world peace. I repeat this again, George W. Bush sent this message to the world that ‘the world has become a better place since the departure of Saddam Hussein.’ Barack Obama followed him. Obama did not end Bush’s war but opened the door to four new wars. Obama did not mention his hidden war agenda in the election campaign, otherwise, people would not stand in line for hours to vote for Obama. The humanitarian catastrophe that is taking place in Ukraine today and The United States is investing billions of dollars in it, this Ukraine policy was shaped by Victoria Nuland in the Barack Obama administration. In a peaceful Ukraine, a Russia-friendly government was overthrown, and a US-friendly government was imposed on Ukraine. Russia ended the Cold War, but the United States did not end its policy of overthrowing governments during the Cold War. Victoria Nuland was Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. Victoria Nuland was not a representative of the American people; she was a representative of think tanks. Ukraine conflict was created by the Obama administration and was part of Barack Obama’s legacy. The decisive chapter of this Ukraine conflict is now written and will be the legacy of Joseph Biden. Biden was Obama’s vice president, then.

 The Trump administration had a good start to relations with China. Trump invited Chinese President Xi Jinping to his Mar-a Lago, Florida. Trump called Xi “my friend.” Trump sought Xi’s help on the North Korean issue, Trump and Kim had two meetings with the help of China, and it agreed that North Korea would not test nuclear missiles. Good relations and dialogue guarantee peace and security. Peter Navarro, President Trump’s Trade and Manufacturing Assistant declared a Trade war against China, and meddling in Hong Kong has soured relations with China.

 The Bush administration had interfered in Pakistan’s internal politics and had pardoned corrupt leaders from President General Pervez Musharraf, who had fled from Pakistan and asked to allow them to come to Pakistan and participate in politics. And these unscrupulous leaders came to power with the support of a foreign power. Then Obama used these leaders in the war on terror. Thirty years later, the people of Pakistan finally got rid of these corrupt leaders. For the first time since Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Prime Minister Imran Khan brought Pakistan to the place where Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto left Pakistan 45 years ago. Pakistan's global and regional prestige was restored. The scars left by these corrupt leaders on Pakistan in 30 years, Prime Minister Imran Khan had cleared in three and a half years. Corrupt leaders had been in government for thirty years, and the United States had never overthrown them. They asked to come to Pakistan and participate in politics. The attitude of the United States in the last forty-five years shows that the leaders who are harming Pakistan accepted it, and leaders who deliver results for Pakistan’s development and prosperity, they work to get Pakistan out of corrupt leaders’ Politics. they were removed from the government by conspiring with corrupt leaders. If these leaders had a conscience, self-sufficiency, and sense of dignity, they would not accept power after the revelation with proof of US intervention to remove the elected democratic government from power.

 The leaders of PPP and PML-N have labeled it as historic that even these parties did not allow the term of democratic government to end. They took over the government saying that PPP and PML-N would fulfill the remaining term together. Low-class politics of low-class leaders. Shame believers in democracy.

  

     

In Seventy Years, Pakistan Has Had Good Relations with America Under the Trump Administration, President Trump Understand the Cost of Damages in Business and Politics, and Trump Understands Pakistan’s Cost of Losses in the War on Terror

In Seventy Years, Pakistan Has Had Good Relations with America Under the Trump Administration, President Trump Understand the Cost of Damages in Business and Politics, and Trump Understands Pakistan’s Cost of Losses in the War on Terror

Mujeeb Khan

 

President Trump "Relations with Pakistan better today than before

 

 

President Trump Welcomes Prime Minister Imran Khan 

 

  Last December, the world saw the Virtual Summit for Democracy. President Biden gave a virtual address to the leaders attending the summit. He gave a lecture to leaders on democracy and the rule of law and said next year this conference will be in person. Interestingly, these countries were the ones that imposed military dictatorships by the United States during the Cold War. Is there anyone in the world who hates democracy, freedom, and the rule of law? Then on April 9, 2022, these leaders saw how the Biden administration had backed the most corrupt leaders in Pakistan and the Supreme Court judges had acted at midnight in support of the corrupt leaders. It was noon in Washington. Prime Minister Imran Khan had good relations with President Donald Trump. Therefore, President Biden did not consider it appropriate to contact Prime Minister Imran Khan. As far as Imran Khan’s foreign policy is concerned, it was in line with the new conditions and realities of the world. America’s own interest in East Asia has grown. Europe and the Middle East are not at the top of the list of US interests. Why would the world be an ally in every war between America and the West?

  It was a judicial coup in Pakistan at midnight on April 9. The court judges said that if we did not intervene, there was a fear that the army might intervene. Now, who can say that the US intervention was behind the court? In 1977, the United States was behind the military to overthrow Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s democratically elected government. Leaders of opposition parties, Army Chief General Zia Haqq, and Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto attended the Independent Day celebrations at the US Embassy in Islamabad on July 4. The US ambassador told Prime Minister Bhutto that “Mr. Prime Minister party is over” and that at two o’clock in the morning of July 5, Prime Minister Bhutto was taken into custody by the army, the government was overthrown, the constitution suspended, General Zia Haqq become the new leader of Pakistan. If this evidence of US interference in the past is presented before a federal court judge in the US, then the judge’s decision on the current political change in Pakistan will surely be that after seeing US interference in the past, the people of Pakistan Doubt justified.

  Professional corrupt leaders come to power only through corruption or foreign backing. The most popular democratically elected government was overthrown by the supreme court. And the extremely corrupt leaders who have cases in the courts and are on bail, and now sitting on the prime minister’s chair. They will now run the government with the help of the United States. These leaders have been in government since the 1990s, these leaders have been ruling off and on and their stomachs are still empty. These leaders have PhDs in corruption. Nawaz Sharif’s party and family have been in corruption for over 30 years. And every time Nawaz Sharif was ousted from the government on the charges of corruption, he would come to power again by wheeling-dealing and bribing influential people. So is the People Party, Asif Ali Zardari has a double Ph.D. in different branches of corruption. When Nawaz Sharif was the Prime Minister, he had sent Zardari to jail for corruption. Then General Pervez Musharraf removed Nawaz Sharif from power and sent him to jail on corruption charges. Before leaving for Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto had said in New York that if she came to power this time, she would not allow Zardari to come to the Prime Minister’s House.

  Let the world see how US President George W Bush in the interest of US foreign policy, not for the rule of law in Pakistan, asks President general Musharraf to forgive Nawaz Sharif, Asif Zardari, and all political leaders and allow them to participate in politics. President Bush may not know, that a Swiss court had found Zardari guilty in a money laundering case. President Musharraf’s response would have been, as is the case in the United States, against charges their name cleared through a judicial process. This is how it is said to the leaders in Pakistan. But in the United States, the administration puts its foreign policy interests first, to this end, it uses corrupt leaders. During the Cold War, the United States used corrupt military regimes to conduct its foreign policy adventures, now it is using the governments of corrupt political leaders to further its own interests. In the last twenty years, how many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America has granted democracy by the United States? the people of these countries had overthrown the corrupt military regimes that the United States had imposed on them, and they bring the democracy, a system of independent and dignity. The Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations have tried to thwart the new democratic regimes in Latin America and the Middle East, but the people failed them. And now the Biden administration has intervened in Pakistan’s democratic process and derailed it.

  The United States has always embraced the most corrupt leaders in Pakistan. And they were good laundromats for the United States. Surprisingly, neither the United States nor the European Union objected to Asif Zardari's appointment as President of Pakistan, as the Swiss court had found them guilty in a money laundering case. They were not ashamed to use a convict in their global agenda, and he was recognized as the President of Pakistan. The United States and the European Union have not said that Asif Zardari should first clear his name in all allegations. Terrorism was promoted in Pakistan under Zardari and Nawaz Sharif governments, 80,000 people were killed, and the $100 billion economic loss was the price tag for becoming an ally of the United States in the so-called war on terror.

  In seven decades, Pakistan-US relations have been excellent under the Donald Trump administration. In his first statement on Afghanistan since becoming President, Trump had sharply criticized Pakistan that the United States had given millions of dollars to Pakistan, but Pakistan did not have a decent job. President Trump was a businessperson; Imran Khan was a cricketer. Both were new to politics. After two meetings between President Trump and Prime Minister Imran Khan, both had a good understanding. President Trump understood what Prime Minister Imran Khan wanted and Prime Minister Imran Khan understood what President Trump wanted. Because President Trump was a businessperson, he understood, that whether the damage was done in business or in politics, it has a huge cost. President Trump realized that in the war on terror, Bush and Obama had put Pakistan on the front line and the loss of life and economic damage was extremely expensive. Prime Minister Khan also felt that the loss of life and war expenses of the United States in the Afghan war was bankrupting it. Prime Minister Imran Khan helped the United States negotiate with the Taliban. Finally, the Trump administration reached an agreement with the Taliban to end the Afghan war.

  President Trump had taken a fair stance on the issue of tension between Pakistan and India. President had made it clear that both Pakistan and India should sit down and discuss the dispute, if they ask me to help, I will help. In four years of President Trump’s absence from US intervention in Pakistan, peace and stability came to Pakistan. Under President Trump, there was a sharp decline Anti-America in Pakistan. The Biden administration has now intervened again in Pakistan. The administration has laid its hands on the backs of corrupt and convicted leaders in Pakistan. The door to political chaos has opened in Pakistan.

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

Friends, not Master: On the Issue of United States Interference in Pakistan, Pakistan Should Do What Congress and The Administration of the United States Did About Russian Interference in America

Friends, not Master: On the Issue of United States Interference in Pakistan, Pakistan Should Do What Congress and The Administration of the United States Did About Russian Interference in America

 

In the fifty years of history of Pakistan’s friendship with China, China has never sabotaged democracy in Pakistan, as the United States and the West sabotaged democracy in Pakistan

Mujeeb Khan

 

President George W Bush and President Asif  Ali Zardari

 President Ronald Reagan and President General Zia Ul Haq

 

  Foreign interference in the internal affairs of sovereign countries is increasing. Democracy has been spoken of by nations. But on the other hand, the freedom of nations to make their own decisions is separated from democracy. And where democracy ends, and autocracy begins. Nations asked whether they are with the West or against the West. They are under pressure to decide what to do. Who to relate to and who not to relate to? This dictation has become a major issue. If the United States does not like anyone to interfere in its internal affairs, then why does the United States like to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries? Russia’s interference in the 2016 US election drew strong reactions from Congress and in the media. Congress had appointed a special counsel to investigate the Russian meddling. The investigation took two years and cost $25 million. More than sixty Russian diplomats have been expelled from the United States for allegedly interfering in US elections. And it said that there was an attempt to damage our democratic system. The roots of the American democratic system are two hundred years deep. And it is not easy to harm them. But despite this, there was a strong reaction in the United States to this intervention. When the United States does not like any outside power to interfere in its democratic system. This is exactly what emerging democracies say.

 Pakistan has been ruled by military dictators for almost 35 years. who was the yes man of US foreign policy, they could not call an enemy of the United States a friend of their country without the permission of the United States, in other words, the status of women in the Taliban’s system today was the position of dictators in the American system at that time? The people of Pakistan have made great sacrifices for freedom and democracy. The United States has never valued or respected the sacrifices of the people of Pakistan for democracy. Standing on the podium, they talk about freedom, democracy, good governance, and corruption. But coming down from the podium, their actions are the opposite. That is Phony and Hippocrates.

 Whenever the democratic era has come in Pakistan, the United States and the West have conspired against it and have undermined democracy in their foreign policy goals. And there are ways to bring the military to power. Military governments work according to their foreign policy agenda. Now because the era of military governments has become outdated. There is talk of democracy, in countries like Pakistan, corrupt political leaders favor them. Corrupt leaders are weak and live in fear, and they are a great alternate to military rule. The governments of Asif Ali Zardari and Nawaz Sharif are before the people. Asif Zardari and Yousaf Raza Gilani were the first to visit the White House after taking the oath. As Vice President Dick Cheney had asked for Pakistan's ambassador to Washington, Zardari had nominated him as Pakistan’s ambassador.

 The Bush-Cheney administration has done injustice to the people of Pakistan who have been accused of corruption and money laundering, they had fled Pakistan. President Bush was trying to bring them back into Pakistan’s politics. President Bush had asked President Musharraf to pardon them and allow them to participate in politics. President Bush did not ask these leaders to first clear their names through a legal process. President Bush has forgotten the rule of law in Pakistan. In the past, the United States has used corrupt military dictators in its foreign policy interest, and now it is using corrupt political leaders. Surprisingly, the corrupt Zardari’s $60 million, which he had kept in a Swiss bank and frozen at the request of the government of Pakistan, returned to Zardari. These corrupt leaders were brought to power by the Bush administration at that time. And their government was tasked with making the war on terror war of attrition. The Bush-Cheney administration was gone but ten years of Zardari and Nawaz Sharif governments were hell for Pakistan. Pakistan is considered one of the most corrupt countries in the world. This is called meddling, which the interfering countries do in their foreign interests. Pakistan paid a heavy price for it.

 Pakistan was the first country to recognize the People’s Republic of China. The Kennedy administration had condemned Pakistan’s decision. Pakistan had established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China. Trade and cultural activities with China began. Ten years later, the United States recognized the People’s Republic of China. This meant that Pakistan’s decision to recognize China was correct. But Pakistan’s decision to join the Western bloc in Cold War was wrong. If Pakistan had the same relations with the Soviet Union as India, then perhaps the political governments in Pakistan would have succeeded. The West’s relations with the Soviet Union fluctuated, sometimes there were extreme tensions, and sometimes normal tensions. Tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union escalated when Soviet troops arrived in Afghanistan. After the arrival of Mikhail Gorbachev in the Kremlin, Soviet Union’s relations with the West improved. Prime minister Margaret Thatcher said after her first meeting with Gorbachev that “we can do business with Gorbachev.” Dinner was given at the White House in honor of Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, champagne was toasted, and US-Soviet relations returned to normal. But Pakistan’s war against Soviet forces continued in Afghanistan. Now, the West had good relations with the Soviet Union. President Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The West has left Pakistan in the mess of the Cold War. After this bitter experience, Prime Minister Imran Khan’s policy is 101% correct that Pakistan wants friendship from all. Small countries should not waste their time participating in military power struggles for nonsense reasons.

 Three years after Pakistan’s independence, the Soviet Union invited Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan to visit Moscow. Prime Minister canceled a visit to the Soviet Union and left for the United States at the invitation of President Harry Truman. President Truman welcomed them with great honors. Truman sent his personal plane to London, carrying Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan to Washington. It was 1950. Twenty years later in 1970, India, with the help of the Soviet Union, tore Pakistan apart. And the US did nothing to save Pakistan from India-Soviet aggression. Now, Pseudo- intellectuals in Pakistan say Imran Khan should not have visited Russia. There is no need to be afraid of anyone in the world. Pakistan is now 75 years old. Those who have been corrupt for seventy years are terrified. Pakistan a mature sovereign country, should make its own decisions without fear.

 The US meddling in Pakistan is once again creating a dangerous situation. The countries of the region are working for stability in Afghanistan in an exceedingly difficult condition. To prevent Afghanistan from becoming a haven for terrorists. Increasing US intervention in Pakistan is giving a new lease of life to extremists. Nawaz Sharif’s party has had ties to al-Qaeda since 1990. Nawaz Sharif also sought bin Laden’s help in winning the election. The Biden administration will hand over the region to terrorists. When the new administration comes, it will start declaring Pakistan a terrorist state. And it will say that the army and ISI of supporting terrorists. The United States has become very tough on the world. The peace-loving nations of the world should have now tough on America.    

           

 

 

NATO’s Special Meddling in a Non-NATO Country, United States Special Lethal Weapons Overnight Delivery to Ukraine, provoke a Special Military Operation, as a Jury World Condemn NATO’s Military Aggressiveness, This Is Not the Democratic Behavior of the West

NATO’s Special Meddling in a Non-NATO Country, United States Special Lethal Weapons Overnight Delivery to Ukraine, provoke a Special Military Operation, as a Jury World Condemn NATO’s Military Aggressiveness, This Is Not the Democratic Behavior of the West

Mujeeb Khan

 

This is what British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss told the world, “If he was able to have success in invading a sovereign nation, what message will that send to another aggressor?” Another aggressor was her nation which invaded sovereign nations Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan.

 

He was a young man in World War II. He would never have thought that he would have to face another war in the 21st century before he died.  

 

Ukrainian must blame its president for handling the situation badly. The United States, NATO, and Western Europe were not Ukraine's closest neighbors. Ukraine's security was linked to Russia's on its border. Until the end of the Cold War in 2008, there was no threat from Russia to Ukraine. the dark clouds of war began to fall when Ukraine opened the door to foreign intervention against Russia. This is exactly what happened with Afghanistan in the 80s. Afghanistan was a neutral country. The Shah of Iran and Pakistan had tried to bring Afghanistan into the American bloc. At the same time, Soviet troops had arrived in Afghanistan. When Ukraine was destroyed, people's homes were ruined, and President Zelensky realized that he was with the wrong leaders.   

 

  Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan asked his chef to make the most delicious dish. The chef made the tongue and presented it to Shah Jahan. Shah Jahan like it very much. Then Shah Jahan asked the chef now you make a dish that tasted bad. The next day the chef made the tongue and presented it to Shah Jahan. Shah Jahan looked at it and said to the chef, ‘you made this delicious dish yesterday, how did it become the worst taste dish?’ The chef said, “Your Majesty, this is the tongue that makes the people friends, and it is the tongue that makes people enemies.” The use of the tongue to make the world an enemy is increasing in America. President Biden’s speech in Poland was like addressing a presidential election rally that Donald Trump cannot be president. Standing in Poland near the Russian border, what was the reason for President Biden slandering President Putin? President Biden has offered no political solution to end the war in Ukraine. Rather, it was a war that would continue until the end of the year or beyond. President Biden began his speech by quoting a statement from Pope John Paul II in 1976. Pope John Paul II was a native of Poland. President Biden has spoken of the past forty-five years. But President Biden did not speak of the world after forty-five. What has the United States done to the world since the end of the Cold War? There was peace on the polish borders during the Cold War. There was no threat of World War III, a nuclear war. Today, Poland is a member of the NATO military pact. And Poland’s borders were shrouded in the dark clouds of World War III. President Biden met with Pope Francis at the Vatican last year for 90 minutes. Pope Francis has spoken to President Biden about ending wars and bringing peace to the world. But President Biden did not talk about peace in Poland on the Ukraine border. President Biden was very belligerent. President Biden has been vociferously threatening Russia and Putin. The United States has imposed the most horrific sanctions of human history on Russia, but President Putin is not as angry about it as President Biden was about the sanctions. That the world is facing shortages of food, and the world is experiencing a manufactured famine. Russia and Ukraine have pushed into war and the hunger for weapons manufacturers has quenched, but bread has become scarce in Africa and the price of bread has doubled and tripled in Europe.

  Biden-Stoltenberg has given the world the Ukraine-Russia war. President Putin had two quite simple demands, which the United States and Europe could solve diplomatically. Six million people worldwide have died from the coronavirus. One million people in the United States have died from the coronavirus, and the virus has not yet been eradicated. The status of coronavirus in Poland and the Baltic states is unknown in the US and European media. There is also no news about the health of the five million Ukrainian refugees. How many Ukrainians had coronavirus? More than a million people have been killed in the war on terror, the Iraq war, the Afghan war, the Libyan war, the Yemen war, the Ukraine-Russia war, and drone strikes. As a result of these wars, seven million homeless are in refugee camps in different countries. It is the unilateral world’s political-military map. This world has created by four presidents of the United States in twenty years.

  It learned that President Biden has faced strong opposition at the NATO conference in Brussels. President Biden was using NATO, while US policy was to send US troops to the Baltic states and provide weapons to Ukraine. These decisions were aggravating the situation. According to the NATO Charter, NATO member states must have a consensus. NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg followed President Biden’s decisions. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz wanted a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine-Russian conflict. President Macron acknowledged that Russia’s security concerns are “very serious” and that we must address them. It should have been presented to NATO countries. The final decision would have been made with their consent. It was possible, that twenty-five NATO countries could have provided security guarantees to Russia. No one was to be paid billions of dollars. But the Biden administration and NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg were looking for a solution to the Ukraine-Russia conflict in war.

  How did US policy on Ukraine come about without the consent of thirty NATO countries? Eastern European countries were not happy with the US war behavior. World War III was about to break out on their borders. Ukraine’s refugee tsunami is spreading to Poland, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, and the Baltic states. This will be a huge burden on the economies of these countries. There is also a risk of spreading the coronavirus. Russia’s enmity has put humanity in trouble. The Ukraine-Russia conflict has divided NATO into factions. NATO East Block and NATO West Block. NATO’s Deputy Secretary-General Mircea Geoana will look after the security interest of Eastern Europe. Mircea Geoana is from Romania, he was the former president of Romania’s Senate. While NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg will oversee security in Western Europe.

  After the Humanitarian catastrophe in Ukraine, President Zelensky has finally agreed that Ukraine will not join NATO, Ukraine will remain neutral, and no foreign military base will be established on Ukraine soil. Security is a problem for both Ukraine and Russia, and it has been settling between the two countries. If the United States and Europe valued Ukraine’s security, they would have sought a solution in a democracy that would keep Ukraine out of the war. A lost president returned home.