Henry Kissinger, Ukraine Must Concede Territory to Russia to
End the War
“Negotiations need to begin in the next two months before it
creates upheavals and tensions that will not easily overcome. Ideally, the
dividing line should be a return to the status quo ante”
“Pursuing the war beyond that point would not be about the freedom
of Ukraine, but a new war against Russia itself.” Kissinger
Mujeeb KhanUkraine should give up territory to Russia for Peace
Kissinger " Taiwan cannot be at the core of US-China negotiations"
Henry Kissinger could not believe that at the age of ninety-eight he
would see the United States and NATO at war with Russia over Ukraine. which
could have been World War III. Henry Kissinger has called on ‘Ukraine must
concede territory to Russia to end the war.’ And negotiate with Russia. The
Ukrainian government fell into the trap of the United States and NATO,
destroying its country, ruining the lives of its people, destroying businesses,
and finally finding Henry Kissinger’s advice to give its territory to Russia
and negotiate with it. The people of Ukraine should ask their President why the
President did not negotiate first when it came to negotiating at the end or first. Why
did the president insist on asking for weapons? However, the President of
Ukraine was aware that NATO and the United States had been fighting the Taliban
in Afghanistan for twenty years with the best weapons and then the war was
finally over at the negotiating table. There was a lack of wisdom and no common
sense in anyone. The government benefits from the ignorance of the people. The United
States has not conducted a study on demographics in Ukraine, nor did it know
the facts on the ground in Ukraine. There were twenty-six pro-Russian political
parties in Ukraine's parliament. Did anyone ask the leaders of these pro-Russian
political parties about Ukraine’s accession to NATO? There were also Ukrainians
in Russia whose relatives were in Ukraine. they will have an opinion on Ukraine’s
accession to NATO. The United States and Europe had an autocratic behavior
toward Ukraine’s accession to NATO.
Volodymyr Zelensky has made a dictator. It has been used against Russia. In history, Zelensky has been the loser and lost leader of
Ukraine. Zelensky’s leadership shines through in Western media publicity.
Zelensky did not have the ability to keep his nation from destruction. These
civilized democratic societies believed in political dialogue. The system of communist countries forced the capitalist countries to become civilized
democracies and show the world they were well-mannered and well-cultured countries. For
seventy years Europe did not fight a war to destroy Europe. Ukraine is at war
with Russia, but this war is destroying Europe’s economy. European leaders must
see to it that their economies depend on resources, if these resources become
scarce, problems will arise for the economy. Russia is already at a disadvantage.
But what will be the consequences of economic sanctions for North America and
Europe? Like what the Taliban had, they had a gun on their shoulder which was
their life. The United States and NATO have been fighting the Taliban for
twenty years, who have everything in the world. Whose loss was it now? Those who
had nothing or those who had everything. Who was the fool now who was far
behind in education or highly educated nations? Henry Kissinger rightly said, “Russia
has been in Europe for four centuries and it will remain in Europe.” Now no one
in Washington knows who the new leader will be in Moscow, will it be Stalin or Gorbachev?
And will Ukraine have a pro-Moscow government or a pro-Brussels government?
The beauty of the American system is that
everyone quickly forgets everything. And no one remembers which administration
did what. The United States and Europe have forgotten Iraq. It does not matter
how the Iraqis are now. Twenty years on, Iraq has not yet become the before the
US invasion. NATO countries invaded and destroyed Libya, though Libya did not
invade any NATO country. But no one in Washington or Brussels looks back at
Libya to see how the Libyan people are living. Why did America destroy Syria?
Was it a picnic? Interestingly, religious extremists, among them Al Qaeda and
ISIS helped to destroy these countries. Syria, Libya, and Iraq were secular,
liberal, and nationalist. They were quite different from other Arab countries. These
countries had considerable progress in education, science, and engineering. There was
a good system of public health. No one asks Bush and Obama how such societies
have been destroyed and punished and now who will build them? The same will happen
with Ukraine. Biden will leave. Ukraine in 2025 no one remembers?