Russia-Ukraine Conflict: It Can Solve in One Hour Forty-five Minutes, Do Not Park NATO’s Tanks in Front of Russia’s Driveway, as is Do Not Park Your SUV in Front of the White House, is a Security Zone
Mujeeb Khan
President Joe Biden and the NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg during the summit in Brussel NATO secretary-general with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelennskyy at Nato Headquarter in Brussels, 'all-out war with Russia'
President Vladimir Putin
Do not think that you are smarter than the one
you are negotiating with but think that he is smarter than you. In the same
way, do not think that what is in front of you is weak, but think that he is
stronger than you. After 20 years of the Afghan war in which NATO has suffered a humiliating
defeat. NATO has created a new dangerous war environment for the world. Can NATO
win the war with Russia after losing the war to the Taliban? Now NATO is trying to
prove its strength with Russia in the Ukraine conflict. In the twenty days since the
war ended in Afghanistan, NATO has created a new war environment for the world.
As the Third World War on Ukraine begins. Russia has a very reasonable demand
that does not park NATO’s tanks in front of our driveway. The US and NATO’s secretary-general insist the tanks are on sovereign land. Russia should not be worried. While
Russia says its troops are on our borders. But the US and NATO are not ready to
back down for peace. If lasting peace is in the interest of humanity, then it
must give importance by accepting certain conditions of Russia. Governments in
Libya, Syria, and Iraq have warned of the dire consequences of US and NATO
intervention against them. They were sovereign countries like Ukraine. The territorial
integrity of these countries was as important as that of Ukraine. But NATO has
launched aggression against Libya, Syria, Iraq but threatens to retaliate
strongly against aggression against Ukraine. This is hypocrisy, this is NATO’s
double face. NATO’s military action in Libya has devastated the lives of the
Libyan people. Libya divided; Libya’s economy has collapsed. People in Libya’s
neighboring countries depend on the Libyan oil industry for their livelihood. Their
lives have also been ruined by NATO’s military action. The people of Libya and its
neighbors should sue NATO in the International Court of Justice. And they
should compensate for the damage caused by the NATO attack. Libya was not in
NATO’s authority. NATO intervention in Libya was an illegal, gross violation of the law of sovereignty. NATO had violated Pakistan’s territorial integrity in the
Afghan war and had conducted drone strikes inside Pakistan, in which innocent
civilians were killed. While Pakistan was helping the US in the Afghan war.
Ukraine is not a
member of NATO, but NATO countries are behind it to protect Ukraine from Russia’s
so-called aggression. Turkey is a member of NATO, but NATO countries were
destabilizing Turkey. Turkish Kurds were trained in guerrilla warfare in Syria
near the Turkish border. Turkey called these Kurds terrorists. The Turkish
government had reacted strongly to the Obama administration, but the administration’s
explanation was that the Kurds would eliminate ISIS from their areas. The Kurds
conducted bombings in Turkey. More than two hundred Turkish citizens were killed in
bomb blasts in Ankara and Istanbul. Turkey was an Islamic country, and NATO
countries were watching on the sidelines. Surprisingly, the United States talks
of promoting democracy in the world, but under the Obama administration, the Turkish
military overthrew the Erdogan government. The plot was not hatched by President
Putin against the NATO member state. In fact, the United States did. China has
not yet overthrown the Taiwanese government. And Russia has not destabilized
the Ukrainian government. China and Russia do not view the world with a Cold
War mentality. Nor do they want to take the world into the Cold War.
Ukraine was not a
conflict before 2012-13. Who wrote the script to make Ukraine a dangerous
conflict, she or he had a severe allergy to peace, suddenly Ukraine becomes a
terrible conflict? Thousands were killed in the conflict. The United States and NATO
have destroyed peace here. The supply of weapons to Ukraine has increased. Twenty
years later, the United States gained independence from the Afghan war because
of the efforts of Russia and China. NATO also has a role to play in making the
Afghan war the longest war in US history. The United States was spending $1
billion per day on the Afghan war. Since the end of the Afghan war, the United
States has saved $150 billion in about five months. Russia and China want the
United States to spend those dollars to protect its people from viruses and
give top priority to public health.
Ukraine is a quite
simple problem that can be solved in one hour and forty-five minutes. Russia and Ukraine
were one country. The two understand each other well. In the Cold War, the Ukrainians
were in government in the Kremlin. They were in the Communist Party’s Bosses. They
had the same political ideology and the same political religion. But the
problem is the politics of NATO and the weapons that stand in the way of
resolving this conflict. NATO’s 30 countries are losers who have lost the war
to the Taliban. NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg should have resigned
after this defeat. Russia and China want neither cold nor hot war in the world.
Their focus is on economic development. NATO and US policy are to keep Russia
and China out of the economic development and engage in wars.
No comments:
Post a Comment