The Eurozone Security Army is a Good Plan, Proposed by French President Macron, This Plan is The Best Solution for Russia’s Security Concerns, NATO Establishment’s Political and Military Agenda is Problematic

The Eurozone Security Army is a Good Plan, Proposed by French President Macron, This Plan is The Best Solution for Russia’s Security Concerns, NATO Establishment’s Political and Military Agenda is Problematic

 

 When there is no country in the world to impose sanctions, then Congress will pass a bill to impose sanctions on its government “Debts and interest on debts will not be paid.”

Mujeeb Khan

 

 

 

Ex German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder, Chairman Nord Stream2 Board of Director 

  The process of resolving disputes between nations broken, and it has been replaced by the US-NATO sections base system, which starts with the threat of war and ends with the use of weapons and sanctions. This new system has become a headache for the peaceful countries of the world. Since the end of the Cold War, there has been no peace in the world. Thirty years world is under war clouds. Indifferent places nations embroiled in conflicts or caught up in conflicts. Sanctions are a dangerous nuclear weapon. Which destroys the economy of nations and thousands of people die because of deprived of basic human needs. The American leadership has taken the world in the wrong direction, where human catastrophe is everywhere. The United States had reached an agreement with Iran on the nuclear deal, but then, under pressure from the Israeli government, the United States terminated the agreement. It reinstated the old sanctions on Iran and with it imposed new and tougher sanctions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “We will strangle Iran’s economy, we will destroy its banking system.” And now the same language is used for Russia. EU countries that had economic projects and trade with Iran, they lost about $100 billion to $200 billion due to sanctions on Iran, it was America’s allies. By imposing economic sanctions on Iran, the United States had severely damaged the economy of its European allies. And now Russia is threatened with its economy. Are bullying and intimidation a decent democracy? The current economic sanctions on Russia have cost Germany $50 billion, France, Italy, Greece, Spain, and other European countries have trade lost also in billions. These are America’s unilateral sanctions and implement by any means in its foreign and defense policy interest. These sanctions are not international rule base. The United States has imposed economic sanctions on Iran to keep Iran behind in economic development and to keep Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates at the forefront of economic development.

  Economic sanctions have been imposed on Russia to prevent it from becoming a major European economy. The second goal is to make Ukraine Europe’s largest economy. Ahead of diplomatic dialogue with Russia on the Ukraine issue, it began receiving threats that it would expel from the global financial system if it attacked Ukraine. Instead of making the atmosphere of dialogue pleasant, the United States and NATO polluted the atmosphere with threats, bullying, and supplying of ships loaded with deadly weapons to Ukraine. The mentality of the military alliance of democracies is that of military dictators.

  Ukraine is Russia’s neighbor and both countries are part of Europe. That is why President Putin thinks a thousand times a day about resolving Ukraine's issue through war. Russia and Ukraine must live in Europe, and both countries do not want to see each other destroyed by war. President Putin is a visionary leader who believes that the United States is dragging him into war. President Putin knows that war can wreak havoc, NATO can be burry without war. NATO’s 20 years presence in Afghanistan is a failure of democracy. NATO has only succeeded in promoting militarism in the world.

  President Putin has economic cards that could guarantee Russia’s security. Gas and oil were given to the countries of Eastern Europe which are members of NATO at thirty-to-thirty five percent higher price. It should call Russia’s security tax. President Putin speaks German very fluently, that’s why German leaders understand President Putin well. President Putin had a remarkably close relationship with former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder. Gas pipelines agreements with Russia were signed by Chancellor Gerhard Schroder’s government. After leaving the government, Chancellor Schroder became chairperson of Russia’s Gazprom Oil Company, and he has a key role to play in the completion of multibillion-dollar gas pipeline projects. Germany will give special importance to economic relations with Russia instead of military confrontation and political tension forever.

  In Libya, the government of Muammar Gaddafi had signed agreements with Italian oil companies. President Gaddafi helped improve Italy’s economy. During the Arab Spring, NATO has begun supporting Gaddafi’s opponents in Benghazi. NATO says Gaddafi’s government was about to genocide its opponents in Benghazi. This is exactly the situation in Ukraine. The Russian government says the Ukrainian government is genocide Russians living in eastern Ukraine, but here NATO backs Ukraine's government. NATO has invaded Libya, a sovereign state, to oust President Gaddafi, he assassinated. Libya was destroyed and since then been in chaos. Italy, a NATO member, had all its oil companies’ agreements with the Gaddafi government terminated. Thousands of Italians lost their jobs. A delegation of Italian investors and businesspeople was in Moscow last week. The delegation has agreements to enhance economic and trade relations between the two countries.

  An important proposal by French President Manual Macron is for the European Union to create its own army. When Europe has its own trade and economic policy, so for the security and defense of the Eurozone, it is necessary to have its own army. With a eurozone army, Russia will also feel comfortable with its security. NATO is an invention of the Cold War era. Its establishment had a political and military agenda. In today’s interconnected economic world, the concept of security in NATO’s politics is outdated.