Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates First Time on
The Right Side of History
The United States, NATO, The European Union could have saved
Ukraine from catastrophe, they just issue a statement that Ukraine will not be included in NATO and the territory of Eastern European Country will not use
against Russia, Period.
Mujeeb Khan
UAE Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi and Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan
Thousands pack Kyiv Train Station to flee Ukraine |
The Ukraine-Russia
war has nothing to do with the 150 countries of the world. This is an
unnecessary NATO and US war against Russia, which the countries of the
world dragged. If NATO had not made in charge of the Ukraine-Russia conflict,
it would have been resolved through diplomatic talks. It was a conflict between two
non-NATO countries. In principle and legally, NATO should not have been the
leader in this conflict by putting the world in the face of World War III. The
people of Ukraine do not go through this miserable ordeal. It is a dilemma that
world leaders are giving people wars all over the world and their lives
becoming miserable, they do war politics of torturing the people. Saddam
Hussein and Osama bin Laden were not so much a threat to the world as NATO is a
threat to the nuclear world war. Ukraine’s leaders are on the wrong side of
history in the conflict with Russia. While NATO and United States had called,
they are on the right side of history. If Ukraine is destroyed, people’s lives are ruined, how can the leaders of Ukraine call on the right side of history? What
does Ukraine get from becoming a member of NATO? Surprisingly, Ukraine leaders
did not see NATO defeated by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Thirty NATO countries
have not conquered Afghanistan in twenty years. This was the defeat of thirty
NATO countries. Libya was also an example of Ukraine’s leaders being attacked by
NATO. Libya, a prosperous country, was destroyed by NATO. Thousands of Libyans
are still without prosperity. Libya was neither on the wrong side of history
nor on the right side of history, Libya had its own history. Ukraine’s leader Zelensky was provoked by NATO and the Biden administration against Russia. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and the Biden administration have repeatedly called
for Ukraine to join NATO. On the other hand, Biden’s administration had
announced to send 7,000 troops to Poland, Romania, and Germany. NATO chief
Stoltenberg has announced an alert for NATO’s Sea, air, and land force. Seeing
the keen interest of the United States, NATO, and the European Union in a
non-NATO Ukraine.
The circle of its
enemies around Russia was getting narrower. The United States and NATO were
constantly ignoring the question of Russia’s security concern. NATO and the
United States were not interested in a peaceful resolution. Surprisingly, in just
thirteen months since President Biden came to power and he has put the world
ahead of the Third World War. The American people are asking if we voted for
Joe Biden? Russia had also to act in its defense. The United States, NATO, and
the European Union could have saved Ukraine from a catastrophe if they had
wanted to. They do not have to spend millions of dollars on it, they just issue
a statement that Ukraine will not be a member of NATO and the territory of
Eastern European countries which are NATO members will not use against Russia.
they would give a copy to the UN Secretary-General. their decision would have
been in the best interests of the Ukrainian people. Their extremely irresponsible
behavior has destroyed Ukraine. People’s lives were ruined. The Biden administration
and NATO’s secretary-general believed that a peaceful diplomatic solution to
the Ukraine-Russia conflict would mean that they would be on the wrong side of
history. The Biden administration is handing over lethal weapons to the
Ukrainian government. Perhaps no one in the United States knows that sixteen
political parties in Ukraine are pro-Russian. These parties have fifty members
in parliament. President Zelensky has banned pro-Russian parties and he has
ended their membership in Parliament.
Forty years ago, when Soviet troops arrived in
Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Arab Islamic countries thought they were allies
of the United States and on the right side of history. During the fifty years
of the Cold War, they continued to support US global policies with this in
mind. Then there were those in Pakistan who strongly opposed president General Zia ul
Huq’s policy of jihad with the United States against the Soviet forces in
Afghanistan, that called on the wrong side of history. India’s Prime Minister Indira
Gandhi strongly opposed jihad against Soviet forces in Afghanistan, and she
called it extremely dangerous for the region’s peace. Prime Minister Indira’s
position was that Soviet troops would leave Afghanistan if the jihadist
training camp in Pakistan closed, and the United States stops giving weapons
to the jihadists. Among those jihadists was Osama bin Laden. Thousands of
Jihadists came from Arab countries to take part in the jihad in Afghanistan. At
that time, Pakistan was as important as Ukraine today in the United States and
West. But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States was the
first to impose economic sanctions on Pakistan, it was building a nuclear bomb.
The jihadists from the Arab Islamic world who took part in the Afghan jihad
against the Soviet Union were making new history in the house of torture Guantanamo
Bay. In Afghanistan, they were on the right side of history with the United
States- the countries that fought the war to overthrow the Soviet Empire got
nothing. They were all losers; Pakistan topped the list.
After 9/11, George
W. Bush established new relations with Pakistan, President Bush assured
Pakistan that what had happened to Pakistan in the past would not happen again.
The United States will help Pakistan’s economic development and investment. Following
these assurances from the Bush administration, Pakistan took a 180-degree-U-turn in
support of the US war against the Taliban government in Afghanistan. Once again,
Pakistan was on the right side of history with the United States. Meanwhile,
the Bush administration had established strategic relations with India. Sixty years
later, India has moved from the wrong side of history to the right side of
history. President Obama has met Prime Minister Modi six times at the White
House and in Delhi, and each time Modi has embraced him warmly. From 2009 to
2015, the Afghan war was fought in Pakistan. NATO and US had sent terrorists from
Afghanistan to Pakistan, while on the other hand, India used to send terrorists
to Pakistan. Bombs were exploding in Pakistan. When the Obama administration
gave evidence of India’s involvement in terrorism in Pakistan, it ignored it, and
Pakistan called ‘do more’ against terrorism. The army and ISI’s headquarters
were under attack. The army had fought for fourteen hours in the terrorist
attack on the naval base in Karachi. Sixty thousand people, including soldiers
killed in terrorism in Pakistan. Pakistan lost $100 billion. US-India strategic
relations were destabilizing Pakistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment