Friday, March 25, 2022

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates First Time on The Right Side of History

  

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates First Time on The Right Side of History

 

The United States, NATO, The European Union could have saved Ukraine from catastrophe, they just issue a statement that Ukraine will not be included in NATO and the territory of Eastern European Country will not use against Russia, Period.

Mujeeb Khan

 


 

UAE Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi and Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan  


Thousands pack Kyiv Train Station to flee Ukraine

 

 The Ukraine-Russia war has nothing to do with the 150 countries of the world. This is an unnecessary NATO and US war against Russia, which the countries of the world dragged. If NATO had not made in charge of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, it would have been resolved through diplomatic talks. It was a conflict between two non-NATO countries. In principle and legally, NATO should not have been the leader in this conflict by putting the world in the face of World War III. The people of Ukraine do not go through this miserable ordeal. It is a dilemma that world leaders are giving people wars all over the world and their lives becoming miserable, they do war politics of torturing the people. Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were not so much a threat to the world as NATO is a threat to the nuclear world war. Ukraine’s leaders are on the wrong side of history in the conflict with Russia. While NATO and United States had called, they are on the right side of history. If Ukraine is destroyed, people’s lives are ruined, how can the leaders of Ukraine call on the right side of history? What does Ukraine get from becoming a member of NATO? Surprisingly, Ukraine leaders did not see NATO defeated by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Thirty NATO countries have not conquered Afghanistan in twenty years. This was the defeat of thirty NATO countries. Libya was also an example of Ukraine’s leaders being attacked by NATO. Libya, a prosperous country, was destroyed by NATO. Thousands of Libyans are still without prosperity. Libya was neither on the wrong side of history nor on the right side of history, Libya had its own history. Ukraine’s leader Zelensky was provoked by NATO and the Biden administration against Russia. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and the Biden administration have repeatedly called for Ukraine to join NATO. On the other hand, Biden’s administration had announced to send 7,000 troops to Poland, Romania, and Germany. NATO chief Stoltenberg has announced an alert for NATO’s Sea, air, and land force. Seeing the keen interest of the United States, NATO, and the European Union in a non-NATO Ukraine.

 The circle of its enemies around Russia was getting narrower. The United States and NATO were constantly ignoring the question of Russia’s security concern. NATO and the United States were not interested in a peaceful resolution. Surprisingly, in just thirteen months since President Biden came to power and he has put the world ahead of the Third World War. The American people are asking if we voted for Joe Biden? Russia had also to act in its defense. The United States, NATO, and the European Union could have saved Ukraine from a catastrophe if they had wanted to. They do not have to spend millions of dollars on it, they just issue a statement that Ukraine will not be a member of NATO and the territory of Eastern European countries which are NATO members will not use against Russia. they would give a copy to the UN Secretary-General. their decision would have been in the best interests of the Ukrainian people. Their extremely irresponsible behavior has destroyed Ukraine. People’s lives were ruined. The Biden administration and NATO’s secretary-general believed that a peaceful diplomatic solution to the Ukraine-Russia conflict would mean that they would be on the wrong side of history. The Biden administration is handing over lethal weapons to the Ukrainian government. Perhaps no one in the United States knows that sixteen political parties in Ukraine are pro-Russian. These parties have fifty members in parliament. President Zelensky has banned pro-Russian parties and he has ended their membership in Parliament.

 Forty years ago, when Soviet troops arrived in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Arab Islamic countries thought they were allies of the United States and on the right side of history. During the fifty years of the Cold War, they continued to support US global policies with this in mind. Then there were those in Pakistan who strongly opposed president General Zia ul Huq’s policy of jihad with the United States against the Soviet forces in Afghanistan, that called on the wrong side of history. India’s Prime Minister Indira Gandhi strongly opposed jihad against Soviet forces in Afghanistan, and she called it extremely dangerous for the region’s peace. Prime Minister Indira’s position was that Soviet troops would leave Afghanistan if the jihadist training camp in Pakistan closed, and the United States stops giving weapons to the jihadists. Among those jihadists was Osama bin Laden. Thousands of Jihadists came from Arab countries to take part in the jihad in Afghanistan. At that time, Pakistan was as important as Ukraine today in the United States and West. But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States was the first to impose economic sanctions on Pakistan, it was building a nuclear bomb. The jihadists from the Arab Islamic world who took part in the Afghan jihad against the Soviet Union were making new history in the house of torture Guantanamo Bay. In Afghanistan, they were on the right side of history with the United States- the countries that fought the war to overthrow the Soviet Empire got nothing. They were all losers; Pakistan topped the list.

  After 9/11, George W. Bush established new relations with Pakistan, President Bush assured Pakistan that what had happened to Pakistan in the past would not happen again. The United States will help Pakistan’s economic development and investment. Following these assurances from the Bush administration, Pakistan took a 180-degree-U-turn in support of the US war against the Taliban government in Afghanistan. Once again, Pakistan was on the right side of history with the United States. Meanwhile, the Bush administration had established strategic relations with India. Sixty years later, India has moved from the wrong side of history to the right side of history. President Obama has met Prime Minister Modi six times at the White House and in Delhi, and each time Modi has embraced him warmly. From 2009 to 2015, the Afghan war was fought in Pakistan. NATO and US had sent terrorists from Afghanistan to Pakistan, while on the other hand, India used to send terrorists to Pakistan. Bombs were exploding in Pakistan. When the Obama administration gave evidence of India’s involvement in terrorism in Pakistan, it ignored it, and Pakistan called ‘do more’ against terrorism. The army and ISI’s headquarters were under attack. The army had fought for fourteen hours in the terrorist attack on the naval base in Karachi. Sixty thousand people, including soldiers killed in terrorism in Pakistan. Pakistan lost $100 billion. US-India strategic relations were destabilizing Pakistan.

                                                                                                                   

No comments:

Post a Comment