In Seventy Years, Pakistan Has Had Good Relations with America Under the Trump Administration, President Trump Understand the Cost of Damages in Business and Politics, and Trump Understands Pakistan’s Cost of Losses in the War on Terror

In Seventy Years, Pakistan Has Had Good Relations with America Under the Trump Administration, President Trump Understand the Cost of Damages in Business and Politics, and Trump Understands Pakistan’s Cost of Losses in the War on Terror

Mujeeb Khan

 

President Trump "Relations with Pakistan better today than before

 

 

President Trump Welcomes Prime Minister Imran Khan 

 

  Last December, the world saw the Virtual Summit for Democracy. President Biden gave a virtual address to the leaders attending the summit. He gave a lecture to leaders on democracy and the rule of law and said next year this conference will be in person. Interestingly, these countries were the ones that imposed military dictatorships by the United States during the Cold War. Is there anyone in the world who hates democracy, freedom, and the rule of law? Then on April 9, 2022, these leaders saw how the Biden administration had backed the most corrupt leaders in Pakistan and the Supreme Court judges had acted at midnight in support of the corrupt leaders. It was noon in Washington. Prime Minister Imran Khan had good relations with President Donald Trump. Therefore, President Biden did not consider it appropriate to contact Prime Minister Imran Khan. As far as Imran Khan’s foreign policy is concerned, it was in line with the new conditions and realities of the world. America’s own interest in East Asia has grown. Europe and the Middle East are not at the top of the list of US interests. Why would the world be an ally in every war between America and the West?

  It was a judicial coup in Pakistan at midnight on April 9. The court judges said that if we did not intervene, there was a fear that the army might intervene. Now, who can say that the US intervention was behind the court? In 1977, the United States was behind the military to overthrow Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s democratically elected government. Leaders of opposition parties, Army Chief General Zia Haqq, and Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto attended the Independent Day celebrations at the US Embassy in Islamabad on July 4. The US ambassador told Prime Minister Bhutto that “Mr. Prime Minister party is over” and that at two o’clock in the morning of July 5, Prime Minister Bhutto was taken into custody by the army, the government was overthrown, the constitution suspended, General Zia Haqq become the new leader of Pakistan. If this evidence of US interference in the past is presented before a federal court judge in the US, then the judge’s decision on the current political change in Pakistan will surely be that after seeing US interference in the past, the people of Pakistan Doubt justified.

  Professional corrupt leaders come to power only through corruption or foreign backing. The most popular democratically elected government was overthrown by the supreme court. And the extremely corrupt leaders who have cases in the courts and are on bail, and now sitting on the prime minister’s chair. They will now run the government with the help of the United States. These leaders have been in government since the 1990s, these leaders have been ruling off and on and their stomachs are still empty. These leaders have PhDs in corruption. Nawaz Sharif’s party and family have been in corruption for over 30 years. And every time Nawaz Sharif was ousted from the government on the charges of corruption, he would come to power again by wheeling-dealing and bribing influential people. So is the People Party, Asif Ali Zardari has a double Ph.D. in different branches of corruption. When Nawaz Sharif was the Prime Minister, he had sent Zardari to jail for corruption. Then General Pervez Musharraf removed Nawaz Sharif from power and sent him to jail on corruption charges. Before leaving for Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto had said in New York that if she came to power this time, she would not allow Zardari to come to the Prime Minister’s House.

  Let the world see how US President George W Bush in the interest of US foreign policy, not for the rule of law in Pakistan, asks President general Musharraf to forgive Nawaz Sharif, Asif Zardari, and all political leaders and allow them to participate in politics. President Bush may not know, that a Swiss court had found Zardari guilty in a money laundering case. President Musharraf’s response would have been, as is the case in the United States, against charges their name cleared through a judicial process. This is how it is said to the leaders in Pakistan. But in the United States, the administration puts its foreign policy interests first, to this end, it uses corrupt leaders. During the Cold War, the United States used corrupt military regimes to conduct its foreign policy adventures, now it is using the governments of corrupt political leaders to further its own interests. In the last twenty years, how many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America has granted democracy by the United States? the people of these countries had overthrown the corrupt military regimes that the United States had imposed on them, and they bring the democracy, a system of independent and dignity. The Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations have tried to thwart the new democratic regimes in Latin America and the Middle East, but the people failed them. And now the Biden administration has intervened in Pakistan’s democratic process and derailed it.

  The United States has always embraced the most corrupt leaders in Pakistan. And they were good laundromats for the United States. Surprisingly, neither the United States nor the European Union objected to Asif Zardari's appointment as President of Pakistan, as the Swiss court had found them guilty in a money laundering case. They were not ashamed to use a convict in their global agenda, and he was recognized as the President of Pakistan. The United States and the European Union have not said that Asif Zardari should first clear his name in all allegations. Terrorism was promoted in Pakistan under Zardari and Nawaz Sharif governments, 80,000 people were killed, and the $100 billion economic loss was the price tag for becoming an ally of the United States in the so-called war on terror.

  In seven decades, Pakistan-US relations have been excellent under the Donald Trump administration. In his first statement on Afghanistan since becoming President, Trump had sharply criticized Pakistan that the United States had given millions of dollars to Pakistan, but Pakistan did not have a decent job. President Trump was a businessperson; Imran Khan was a cricketer. Both were new to politics. After two meetings between President Trump and Prime Minister Imran Khan, both had a good understanding. President Trump understood what Prime Minister Imran Khan wanted and Prime Minister Imran Khan understood what President Trump wanted. Because President Trump was a businessperson, he understood, that whether the damage was done in business or in politics, it has a huge cost. President Trump realized that in the war on terror, Bush and Obama had put Pakistan on the front line and the loss of life and economic damage was extremely expensive. Prime Minister Khan also felt that the loss of life and war expenses of the United States in the Afghan war was bankrupting it. Prime Minister Imran Khan helped the United States negotiate with the Taliban. Finally, the Trump administration reached an agreement with the Taliban to end the Afghan war.

  President Trump had taken a fair stance on the issue of tension between Pakistan and India. President had made it clear that both Pakistan and India should sit down and discuss the dispute, if they ask me to help, I will help. In four years of President Trump’s absence from US intervention in Pakistan, peace and stability came to Pakistan. Under President Trump, there was a sharp decline Anti-America in Pakistan. The Biden administration has now intervened again in Pakistan. The administration has laid its hands on the backs of corrupt and convicted leaders in Pakistan. The door to political chaos has opened in Pakistan.