The End of the Cold War Marked the Beginning of Violations
of International Law and the UN Charter, the US and European Sanctions are a
Violation of Law of Sovereignty, These Countries Impose Sanctions in the
Interest of Their Foreign Policy and Force One Hundred and Fifty Countries of
the World to Follow It
The recent victim of this policy is Pakistan, why did Prime
Minister Imran Khan go to meet Russian President Putin? Imran Khan violated US sanctions
on Russia, so he must remove from power. The governor of California has more
sovereign rights under the US Constitution, he can go to China and do trade
deals, but the Prime Minister of Pakistan cannot do trade deals with Russia
under the sovereign rights of the UN Charter
Mujeeb Khan
"Ukraine has the same rights that every sovereign nation" President Biden addressed to the UN GerenalAssembly, Sept26, 2022
President Barack Obama about the Situation in Libya at the White House, March 18, 2011
Three decades after the
end of the Cold War, when the world is on the brink of World War III, now it said
that the UN Charter of 1945, which said to respect the sovereignty of
nations, should also be implemented on the international laws related to it. After
the end of the Cold War, it was the US, its European allies, and NATO that ignored
the laws of sovereignty and made a policy of attacking sovereign countries, and
international laws were violated. At that time, violations of international law were considered their right. The US had attacked sovereign countries that were never a
threat to its security. They were dragged into the so-called war on terror. The CIA
had conducted operations against terrorists on the territory of sovereign
countries. And all those who were caught were later found innocent. NATO’s involvement in
these military operations with the US was a violation of international law.
The NATO military
pact was created for the security and defense of Western Europe during the Cold
War. The charter which was signed only by the countries of Western Europe, and
NATO will place on the border of Western Europe, with the fall of the Berlin
Wall, NATO should dismantle it. But their hidden ambition was to militarize the
world and for that purpose, NATO gave a new mission. After 9/11, international
law was suspended, and the law of President America came to the world. Congress had
given war powers to the President. The President had misused the war power. The
Taliban did not attack the United States. The Taliban, who became Mujahideen
for the United States in the war against the Soviet Union, fought the Soviet
forces. They destroyed their own country in this war, but the United States won
the Cold War, and now America had become their enemy. Even then it said that
Soviet forces had occupied a sovereign Islamic country, and it was called a violation
of the UN Charter. But 23 years later, the United States invaded Afghanistan to
eliminate Al-Qaeda. The US claimed that Al-Qaeda had conducted the 9/11 attack
on the US. This war could have been avoided; Mullah Omar was willing to hand over al-Qaeda
leaders to a third country. the President had to use the war power in all cases.
This war aimed at eliminating al-Qaeda from Afghanistan. But then it said that
the war would continue until the Taliban was eliminated. In this mission, the
United States called for NATO troops in Afghanistan. Under which international
law and UN charter were foreign forces going to eliminate the Taliban? The
armies of the world’s richest countries were fighting with the world’s poorest
people in a war-torn country. Even a lion in the forest, when it sees animals
sick and dying, the lion does not kill it. It was NATO’s pre-emptive war
against Afghanistan. NATO forces from Afghanistan conducted four hundred drone
strikes inside Pakistan. This NATO strike was the cornerstone of bringing the
war on terror to Pakistan. Pakistan was given the honor of being a non-NATO
member by President Bush. The general was delighted with the honor and their
cooperation with NATO increased four-fold. NATO’s strikes inside Pakistan were
a violation of international law and the UN law of Sovereignty.
The US-UK
pre-emptive attack on Iraq, a sovereign country, was illegal, as Secretary
General UN Kofi Annan said. Iraq did not attack America or Britain, but they
attacked Iraq. The United Nations Security Council did not authorize to attack on Iraq. But the United States and Great Britain occupied Iraq and established their
own government in Baghdad. They fired Iraqis from all government offices. It
was a gross violation of a country’s sovereignty. How the most powerful countries
were occupying and destroying the poor, small, and weak countries. International
law and the UN Charter were not with them, they were so powerful. Colonel
Muammar Gaddafi handed over all his deadly weapons to the 43rd
President George Bush. President Gaddafi now can remain in power and no action
will take against him, assured by President Bush. When 44th
President Barrack Obama came to power, he along with France, Great Britain, and
NATO, bombed Libya and ended the Gaddafi government. The reason given was that
President Gaddafi was about to commit genocide against his opponents in
Benghazi. They handed over Libya to Islamic extremists. America and NATO have
destabilized the region. This is the way they expand the war against terror. Under which
international laws NATO bombed a sovereign Libya? Where was the UN Charter? Even
under the leadership of 44th President Obama, ruins have been created in
Syria. Syria did not attack America. Then why was Syria a sovereign country
destroyed? And under what law was it destroyed? President Obama was a professor
of law. But he was violating international laws and the UN Charter. It is a
history of continuous violations of international law and the UN Charter.
Israel also participates in this, which continues to bomb sovereign countries
in the Middle East.